Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ackerley Tng" <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	"Alexey Kardashevskiy" <aik@amd.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"Fred Griffoul" <fgriffo@amazon.co.uk>,
	"Jacob Pan" <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Jianxiong Gao" <jxgao@google.com>,
	"John Starks" <John.Starks@microsoft.com>,
	"Michael Roth" <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Samiullah Khawaja" <skhawaja@google.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Tarun Sahu" <tarunsahu@google.com>,
	"Vishal Annapurve" <vannapurve@google.com>,
	"Xu Yilun" <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	"Fuad Tabba" <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 50/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd conversions with sample memory provider backing
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2026 00:44:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-203461@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106-gmem-alternative-providers-v3-50-8484dde66a7e@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
issues to consider:
- [Low] KVM: selftests: file descriptor leak of gup_test_fd in
  __pin_pages()
- [Low] KVM: selftests: gmem_fd leak in gmem_conversions_do_setup()
- [Low] KVM: selftests: wrong relative include path to memory_provider.h
--

commit 60d8850de9774956f2ff25264d606f044e04bb8c
Author: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>

KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd conversions with sample memory provider backing

This commit adds a fixture variant to guest_memfd_conversions_test to test
guest_memfd conversions backed by the sample memory provider, and adds a
__pin_pages() helper so the elevated_refcount test can check that pinning
PFN-backed memory fails.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> index d42e201eba763..9793818f54d23 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ int __pin_task_to_cpu(pthread_t task, int cpu)
>  
>  static int gup_test_fd = -1;
>  
> -void pin_pages(void *vaddr, uint64_t size)
> +int __pin_pages(void *vaddr, uint64_t size)
>  {
>  	const struct pin_longterm_test args = {
>  		.addr = (uint64_t)vaddr,
> @@ -685,7 +685,12 @@ void pin_pages(void *vaddr, uint64_t size)
>  	gup_test_fd = __open_path_or_exit("/sys/kernel/debug/gup_test", O_RDWR,
>  					  "Is CONFIG_GUP_TEST enabled?");
>  
> -	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(ioctl(gup_test_fd, PIN_LONGTERM_TEST_START, &args), 0);
> +	return ioctl(gup_test_fd, PIN_LONGTERM_TEST_START, &args);
> +}

[Severity: Low]
Does __pin_pages() leak gup_test_fd when the PIN_LONGTERM_TEST_START ioctl
fails?  In the elevated_refcount multipage test for the mp variant,
__pin_pages() is expected to fail and the caller returns early without
calling unpin_pages(), so each loop iteration overwrites gup_test_fd
without closing the previous descriptor.  Closing and resetting
gup_test_fd via kvm_free_fd(gup_test_fd) when the ioctl returns an error
would avoid the leak.

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/guest_memfd_conversions_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/guest_memfd_conversions_test.c
> index 023df9cb9d4a6..d0cbb1353d7ee 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/guest_memfd_conversions_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/guest_memfd_conversions_test.c
> @@ -16,11 +16,13 @@
>  #include "kselftest_harness.h"
>  #include "test_util.h"
>  #include "ucall_common.h"
> +#include "../../../../samples/kvm/memory_provider.h"

[Severity: Low]
Should this relative path have five "../" components instead of four?
Files under tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/ sit five levels below the
repository root (like tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c, which
includes "../../../../../mm/gup_test.h").  With four "../" components, the
preprocessor searches two levels above the kernel tree via
-I$(LINUX_TOOL_INCLUDE) before resolving the header through
-I$(LINUX_TOOL_ARCH_INCLUDE), which breaks file-relative lookup for tools
and risks picking up a file outside the checkout.

[ ... ]

> @@ -75,10 +109,12 @@ static void gmem_conversions_do_setup(test_data_t *t,
>  
>  	vm = __vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &t->vcpu, nr_pages, guest_do_rmw);
>  
> +	t->expect_pin_failure = variant->expect_pin_failure;
>  	t->resource_fd = -1;
>  
>  	if (variant->create_resource) {
> -		uint64_t flags = gmem_flags | GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_USE_RESOURCE;
> +		uint64_t flags = gmem_flags | GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_USE_RESOURCE |
> +				 variant->extra_flags;
>  
>  		t->resource_fd = variant->create_resource(size);
>  		TEST_ASSERT(t->resource_fd >= 0, "Failed to create backing resource");

[Severity: Low]
Does gmem_conversions_do_setup() leak the local gmem_fd created by
__vm_create_guest_memfd_resource() for resource-backed variants?
vm_mem_add() duplicates a caller-supplied gmem_fd via kvm_dup(gmem_fd)
rather than taking ownership of it:

tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/guest_memfd_conversions_test.c:gmem_conversions_do_setup() {
	if (variant->create_resource) {
		...
		gmem_fd = __vm_create_guest_memfd_resource(vm, size, flags,
							   t->resource_fd);
		TEST_ASSERT(gmem_fd >= 0, "Failed to create guest_memfd with resource");
	}

	vm_mem_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_SHMEM, gpa, slot, nr_pages,
		   KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD, gmem_fd, 0, gmem_flags);
}

Because gmem_fd is never closed after vm_mem_add(), the guest_memfd file
and its attached backing resource (including the CMA pages allocated by
the memory_provider module in the mp variant) stay pinned across teardown
in multipage test loops until the process exits.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106-gmem-alternative-providers-v3-0-8484dde66a7e@google.com?part=50


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-08  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-07  0:36 [PATCH RFC v3 00/88] guest_memfd alternative providers Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Split folio allocation and insertion in kvm_gmem_get_folio Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Route folio allocation through native provider operations Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/88] mm: shmem: Implement guest_memfd provider operations for tmpfs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support provider folio invalidation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support using resource provider Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/88] KVM: selftests: Add helper to create guest_memfd with a resource file Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/88] KVM: selftests: Test negative validation of resource_fd argument Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of unsupported filesystem for resource_fd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of memfd " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of swap tmpfs mounts Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of hugepage " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of regular file in tmpfs mount Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd with tmpfs resource pool Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 14/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd resource pool sharing across instances Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 15/88] KVM: selftests: Test memory allocation against shared tmpfs resource pool Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 16/88] KVM: selftests: Test that shared tmpfs resource pool size limit is respected Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 17/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest execution with tmpfs-backed guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 18/88] KVM: selftests: Document testing TODOs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 19/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd conversions with tmpfs backing Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 20/88] samples/kvm: Introduce memory provider module skeleton Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 21/88] samples/kvm: Support creating memory provider files Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 22/88] samples/kvm: Support marking page ranges present or absent Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 23/88] samples/kvm: Support marking page ranges read-only Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 24/88] samples/kvm: Support querying provider file statistics Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 25/88] KVM: selftests: Add basic test for sample memory provider Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 26/88] KVM: selftests: Test marking page ranges present and absent Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 27/88] KVM: selftests: Test marking page ranges read-only Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 28/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support reporting PFN attributes Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 29/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support getting PFNs for stage 2 from providers Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 30/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Refactor error handling in kvm_gmem_fault_user_mapping Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 31/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Set VM_PFNMAP on VMA in PFN mode Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 32/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support user fault handling " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 33/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Skip checking outstanding references " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 34/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support converting to shared " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 35/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support preallocating memory via fallocate " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 36/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Clamp hole punch range to inode size Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 37/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support reclaim during hole punch in PFN mode Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 38/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support arch reclaim on inode destruction " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 39/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support put_pfn_range provider op " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 40/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Add TODO for memory failure handling " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 41/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow attaching PFN-backed providers Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 42/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Export kvm_gmem_revoke for provider-driven revocation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 43/88] KVM: selftests: Test flag dependency of PFN_MODE on USE_RESOURCE Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 44/88] samples/kvm: Implement attach and release provider ops in sample provider Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 45/88] samples/kvm: Disallow MP_SET_READONLY after attach Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 46/88] samples/kvm: Implement get_pfn provider operation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 47/88] samples/kvm: Implement put_pfn_range " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 48/88] samples/kvm: Support dynamic revocation via kvm_gmem_revoke Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 49/88] samples/kvm: Implement lookup_pfn_range provider operation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 50/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd conversions with sample memory provider backing Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 51/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support reporting PFN cacheability Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 52/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support mmap provider operation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 53/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support check_set_attributes " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 54/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support read and write operations and provider callbacks Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 55/88] vfio: Track device file access mode with an enum Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 56/88] vfio: Support VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_FLAG_CTRL_ONLY Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 57/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd provider operations via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 58/88] vfio/pci: Implement attach and release provider ops for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 59/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd get_pfn provider op via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 60/88] vfio/pci: Implement get_pfn provider op for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 61/88] vfio: Implement mmap " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 62/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd check_set_attributes via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 63/88] vfio/pci: Implement check_set_attributes provider op for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 64/88] vfio: Add vfio_device_gmem_revoke helper " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 65/88] vfio/pci: Revoke guest_memfd memory on BAR invalidation and reset Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 66/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd lookup_pfn_range via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 67/88] vfio/pci: Implement lookup_pfn_range provider op for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 68/88] vfio/pci: Use iov_iter for MMIO read and write Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 69/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd read and write provider ops via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 70/88] vfio/pci: Introduce vfio_pci_bar_rw_kbuf for kernel buffer MMIO access Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 71/88] vfio/pci: Implement read and write provider ops for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 72/88] KVM: selftests: Add initial VFIO test verifying device info Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 73/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO region info for igb device Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 74/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO IRQ " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 75/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO MMIO read and write " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 76/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO MMIO mmap access " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 77/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO device reset " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 78/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO access directly and via guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 79/88] KVM: selftests: Verify BAR revocation and access gating in low power state Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 80/88] KVM: selftests: Verify host VMA flags for VFIO BAR Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 81/88] KVM: selftests: Verify guest mapping " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 82/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO dmabuf creation for igb device Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 83/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO ioeventfd " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 84/88] KVM: selftests: Verify memory conversions for VFIO BARs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 85/88] KVM: selftests: Verify shared and private mmap access " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:38 ` [PATCH RFC v3 86/88] KVM: selftests: Expect successful conversion on MSI-X BARs in VFIO test Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:38 ` [PATCH RFC v3 87/88] QUESTION: KVM: guest_memfd: Disallow private mappings of shared-only PFNs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:38 ` [PATCH RFC v3 88/88] KVM: selftests: Verify shared and private pread and pwrite for VFIO BARs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-203461@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=John.Starks@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fgriffo@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=jxgao@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox