Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ackerley Tng" <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	"Alexey Kardashevskiy" <aik@amd.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"Fred Griffoul" <fgriffo@amazon.co.uk>,
	"Jacob Pan" <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Jianxiong Gao" <jxgao@google.com>,
	"John Starks" <John.Starks@microsoft.com>,
	"Michael Roth" <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Samiullah Khawaja" <skhawaja@google.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Tarun Sahu" <tarunsahu@google.com>,
	"Vishal Annapurve" <vannapurve@google.com>,
	"Xu Yilun" <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	"Fuad Tabba" <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 71/88] vfio/pci: Implement read and write provider ops for guest_memfd
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2026 00:44:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-203482@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106-gmem-alternative-providers-v3-71-8484dde66a7e@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] vfio/pci: unserialized sub-page BAR access in
  vfio_pci_core_gmem_rw()
- [High] vfio/pci: D3 MMIO access in vfio_pci_core_gmem_rw() when
  runtime PM engaged
--

commit a60cfc9fb84848a43b5d6f8b77f7f250457c4495
Author: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>

vfio/pci: Implement read and write provider ops for guest_memfd

This commit implements the .gmem_read and .gmem_write provider operations
in vfio-pci to service guest_memfd read and write accesses to mappable
MMIO BARs.

> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index a9274d95e9066..c976574782663 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -2871,6 +2871,42 @@ int vfio_pci_core_gmem_lookup_pfn_range(struct vfio_device *core_vdev,
>  	return -ENOENT;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_gmem_lookup_pfn_range);
> +
> +static ssize_t vfio_pci_core_gmem_rw(struct vfio_device *core_vdev,
> +				     void *kbuf, size_t count,
> +				     loff_t *ppos, bool iswrite)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev =
> +		container_of(core_vdev, struct vfio_pci_core_device, vdev);
> +	unsigned int index = VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(*ppos);
> +
> +	if (!count)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (index >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS || !vdev->bar_mmap_supported[index])
> +		return -EINVAL;

[Severity: High]
Can a sub-page BAR access here race with a reset or power transition?

In vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(), a page-aligned BAR smaller than PAGE_SIZE has
 its remainder reserved via dummy_res and vdev->bar_mmap_supported[bar] set
to true.  Unlike vfio_pci_core_gmem_get_pfn() and
vfio_pci_core_gmem_lookup_pfn_range(), which reject BARs where
pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) >> PAGE_SHIFT is 0, vfio_pci_core_gmem_rw()
allows them and calls vfio_pci_bar_rw_kbuf() with test_mem = false.

Skipping vdev->memory_lock relies on vfio_pci_zap_bars() revoking the BAR
range in guest_memfd so __kvm_gmem_revoke() takes
filemap_invalidate_lock() and drains in-flight kvm_gmem_rw() calls.  For a
sub-page BAR, however, vfio_pci_zap_bars() passes nr_pages = 0:

drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c:vfio_pci_zap_bars() {
	...
			gmem_start = VFIO_PCI_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(i) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
			nr_pages = pci_resource_len(vdev->pdev, i) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
			pfn = pci_resource_start(vdev->pdev, i) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

			vfio_device_gmem_revoke(&vdev->vdev, gmem_start,
						nr_pages, &pfn);
	...
}

When nr_pages is 0, __kvm_gmem_revoke() returns early before acquiring
filemap_invalidate_lock(inode->i_mapping):

CPU0                                  CPU1
kvm_gmem_rw()
  filemap_invalidate_lock_shared()
  vfio_pci_core_gmem_rw()
    vfio_pci_get_bars_available()
                                      vfio_pci_ioctl_reset()
                                        down_write(&vdev->memory_lock)
                                        vfio_pci_zap_bars()
                                          vfio_pci_set_bars_available(false)
                                          __kvm_gmem_revoke(..., nr_pages=0)
                                            return 0;
                                        pci_try_reset_function()
    vfio_pci_bar_rw_kbuf(..., false)
      vfio_pci_core_iowrite()  <-- MMIO during reset

This allows MMIO reads and writes to run concurrently with a PCI reset, a
transition to PCI_D3hot, or clearing PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY, which can cause
Completer Abort / Unsupported Request errors or synchronous external
aborts.

> +
> +	/* Lockless check on availability of BARs. */
> +	if (!vfio_pci_get_bars_available(vdev))
> +		return -EIO;
> +
> +	return vfio_pci_bar_rw_kbuf(vdev, kbuf, count, ppos, iswrite, false);

[Severity: High]
Can vfio_pci_core_gmem_rw() issue MMIO accesses while the device is
runtime-suspended in D3?

Unlike vfio_pci_rw(), vfio_pci_core_gmem_rw() does not call
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and passes test_mem = false to
vfio_pci_bar_rw_kbuf(), relying on vdev->bars_available to be false while
runtime PM low-power mode is engaged (vdev->pm_runtime_engaged).

When userspace enters low-power mode via
VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_LOW_POWER_ENTRY, vfio_pci_runtime_pm_entry() zaps BARs
(setting bars_available = false), sets vdev->pm_runtime_engaged = true,
and drops the runtime PM reference.  If userspace then performs a config
write (or a reset ioctl), vfio_pci_rw() temporarily resumes the device to
D0 for the duration of the call.  Because vdev->pm_wake_eventfd_ctx is
NULL, vfio_pci_core_runtime_resume() leaves vdev->pm_runtime_engaged set
to true, but the config write or reset path re-enables bars_available
without checking !vdev->pm_runtime_engaged:

drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:vfio_basic_config_write() {
	...
		if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) {
			vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false);
			vfio_pci_set_bars_available(vdev, true);
		}
	...
}

When the config write finishes and calls pm_runtime_put(),
vfio_pci_core_runtime_suspend() suspends the device back to D3 without
clearing bars_available.  Subsequent guest_memfd reads and writes see
vfio_pci_get_bars_available(vdev) == true and perform MMIO against the
device while it is in D3.

Conversely, when waking from VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_LOW_POWER_ENTRY_WITH_WAKEUP,
vfio_pci_core_runtime_resume() calls __vfio_pci_runtime_pm_exit() without
restoring bars_available = true, leaving guest_memfd BAR accesses failing
with -EIO after wakeup.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106-gmem-alternative-providers-v3-0-8484dde66a7e@google.com?part=71


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-08  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-07  0:36 [PATCH RFC v3 00/88] guest_memfd alternative providers Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Split folio allocation and insertion in kvm_gmem_get_folio Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Route folio allocation through native provider operations Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/88] mm: shmem: Implement guest_memfd provider operations for tmpfs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support provider folio invalidation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support using resource provider Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/88] KVM: selftests: Add helper to create guest_memfd with a resource file Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/88] KVM: selftests: Test negative validation of resource_fd argument Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of unsupported filesystem for resource_fd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of memfd " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of swap tmpfs mounts Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 11/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of hugepage " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 12/88] KVM: selftests: Test rejection of regular file in tmpfs mount Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 13/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd with tmpfs resource pool Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 14/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd resource pool sharing across instances Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 15/88] KVM: selftests: Test memory allocation against shared tmpfs resource pool Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 16/88] KVM: selftests: Test that shared tmpfs resource pool size limit is respected Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 17/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest execution with tmpfs-backed guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 18/88] KVM: selftests: Document testing TODOs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 19/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd conversions with tmpfs backing Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 20/88] samples/kvm: Introduce memory provider module skeleton Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 21/88] samples/kvm: Support creating memory provider files Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 22/88] samples/kvm: Support marking page ranges present or absent Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 23/88] samples/kvm: Support marking page ranges read-only Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 24/88] samples/kvm: Support querying provider file statistics Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC v3 25/88] KVM: selftests: Add basic test for sample memory provider Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 26/88] KVM: selftests: Test marking page ranges present and absent Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 27/88] KVM: selftests: Test marking page ranges read-only Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 28/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support reporting PFN attributes Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 29/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support getting PFNs for stage 2 from providers Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 30/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Refactor error handling in kvm_gmem_fault_user_mapping Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 31/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Set VM_PFNMAP on VMA in PFN mode Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 32/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support user fault handling " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 33/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Skip checking outstanding references " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 34/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support converting to shared " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 35/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support preallocating memory via fallocate " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 36/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Clamp hole punch range to inode size Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 37/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support reclaim during hole punch in PFN mode Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 38/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support arch reclaim on inode destruction " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 39/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support put_pfn_range provider op " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 40/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Add TODO for memory failure handling " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 41/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow attaching PFN-backed providers Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 42/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Export kvm_gmem_revoke for provider-driven revocation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 43/88] KVM: selftests: Test flag dependency of PFN_MODE on USE_RESOURCE Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 44/88] samples/kvm: Implement attach and release provider ops in sample provider Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 45/88] samples/kvm: Disallow MP_SET_READONLY after attach Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 46/88] samples/kvm: Implement get_pfn provider operation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 47/88] samples/kvm: Implement put_pfn_range " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 48/88] samples/kvm: Support dynamic revocation via kvm_gmem_revoke Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 49/88] samples/kvm: Implement lookup_pfn_range provider operation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 50/88] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd conversions with sample memory provider backing Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 51/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support reporting PFN cacheability Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 52/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support mmap provider operation Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 53/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support check_set_attributes " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 54/88] KVM: guest_memfd: Support read and write operations and provider callbacks Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 55/88] vfio: Track device file access mode with an enum Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 56/88] vfio: Support VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_FLAG_CTRL_ONLY Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 57/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd provider operations via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 58/88] vfio/pci: Implement attach and release provider ops for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 59/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd get_pfn provider op via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 60/88] vfio/pci: Implement get_pfn provider op for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 61/88] vfio: Implement mmap " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 62/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd check_set_attributes via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 63/88] vfio/pci: Implement check_set_attributes provider op for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 64/88] vfio: Add vfio_device_gmem_revoke helper " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 65/88] vfio/pci: Revoke guest_memfd memory on BAR invalidation and reset Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 66/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd lookup_pfn_range via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 67/88] vfio/pci: Implement lookup_pfn_range provider op for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 68/88] vfio/pci: Use iov_iter for MMIO read and write Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 69/88] vfio: Dispatch guest_memfd read and write provider ops via vfio_device_ops Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 70/88] vfio/pci: Introduce vfio_pci_bar_rw_kbuf for kernel buffer MMIO access Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 71/88] vfio/pci: Implement read and write provider ops for guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 72/88] KVM: selftests: Add initial VFIO test verifying device info Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 73/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO region info for igb device Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 74/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO IRQ " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 75/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO MMIO read and write " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 76/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO MMIO mmap access " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 77/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO device reset " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 78/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO access directly and via guest_memfd Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 79/88] KVM: selftests: Verify BAR revocation and access gating in low power state Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 80/88] KVM: selftests: Verify host VMA flags for VFIO BAR Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 81/88] KVM: selftests: Verify guest mapping " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 82/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO dmabuf creation for igb device Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 83/88] KVM: selftests: Verify VFIO ioeventfd " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 84/88] KVM: selftests: Verify memory conversions for VFIO BARs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:37 ` [PATCH RFC v3 85/88] KVM: selftests: Verify shared and private mmap access " Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:38 ` [PATCH RFC v3 86/88] KVM: selftests: Expect successful conversion on MSI-X BARs in VFIO test Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-07  0:38 ` [PATCH RFC v3 87/88] QUESTION: KVM: guest_memfd: Disallow private mappings of shared-only PFNs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-11-08  0:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  0:38 ` [PATCH RFC v3 88/88] KVM: selftests: Verify shared and private pread and pwrite for VFIO BARs Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-203482@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=John.Starks@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fgriffo@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=jxgao@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tarunsahu@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox