Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add ICE phandle

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 19/01/2026 10:47, Neeraj Soni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/16/2026 12:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/01/2026 07:50, Neeraj Soni wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 1/15/2026 2:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 03:18:47PM +0530, Neeraj Soni wrote:
>>>>> Starting with sc7280(kodiak), the ICE will have its own device-tree node.
>>>>> So add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Soni <neeraj.soni@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml | 4 ++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
>>>>> index 938be8228d66..8a6a25ceabe1 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
>>>>> @@ -140,6 +140,10 @@ properties:
>>>>>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>>>>      description: platform specific settings for DLL_CONFIG reg.
>>>>>  
>>>>> +  qcom,ice:
>>>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>>>> +    description: phandle to the Inline Crypto Engine node
>>>>
>>>> Description should also say: for what purpose.
>>>>
>>>> You either have this phandle or ICE address space on sc7280 and newer.
>>>> You cannot have both, so your schema should encode it properly.
>>>>
>>> Sure. I will update this in next patch.
>>>
>>>> Otherwise you just sent something which already was on the list and it
>>>> even was reviewed:
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ba3da82d-999b-b040-5230-36e60293e0fd@linaro.org/
>>>>
>>>> You even copied the commit msg but did copy the authorship!
>>>>
>>> Sure. Thanks for pointing out. I will fix the authorship in next patch.
>>
>> If you add if:then: cases, the patch will differ, so make it your own.
> 
> Okay.
> 
>> But sending exactly the same patch with the same commit msg as what is
>> already on the lists under your own name is not correct.
>>>>
> Okay this was not intended and have taken care of authorship in my other posts but i will ensure
> not to repeat in future.
> 
>>>> Anyway v3 and v4 were not correct and probably v2 should be used after
>>>> adjusting it with my comments.
>>>>
>>> Okay. As i see your comment in v2 here:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8eea30f-5ea2-cfc9-273a-3c6e99a316b9@linaro.org/
>>>
>>> i guess what you want is not to drop the entries for clock but rather capture it
>>> in the "description" of the ICE phandle entry. Is this understanding correct?
>>
>> Clocks should not be touched, but reg should.
>>
> Okay but In sdhci-msm.yaml file:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml#n78
> 
> the currenty entries for "reg-names" do not specify for which hardware register range they are added. So shall i add something like

Read the rest of the binding.

And finally wrap your emails correctly. I am bored asking this over and
over, so if there is silence in the future - you can guess why.

Best regards,
Krzysztof