Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
To: hare@kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] enable bs > ps for block devices
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 13:37:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240530133721.jqbr7jkknnkxdsli@quentin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510102906.51844-1-hare@kernel.org>

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:29:01PM +0200, hare@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> based on the patch series from Pankaj '[PATCH v5 00/11] enable bs > ps in XFS'
> it's now quite simple to enable support for block devices with block sizes
> larger than page size even without having to disable CONFIG_BUFFER_HEAD.
> The patchset really is just two rather trivial patches to fs/mpage,
> and two patches to remove hardcoded restrictions on the block size.
> 
> As usual, comments and reviews are welcome.
> 
> Hannes Reinecke (4):
>   fs/mpage: use blocks_per_folio instead of blocks_per_page
>   fs/mpage: avoid negative shift for large blocksize
>   block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize
>   block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes
> 
> Pankaj Raghav (1):
>   nvme: enable logical block size > PAGE_SIZE
> 
>  block/bdev.c             | 10 ++++++---
>  drivers/nvme/host/core.c |  7 +++----
>  fs/mpage.c               | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------

What about fs/buffer.c? Do we need some changes there?

One obvious place I see is:

diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 8c19e705b9c3..ae248a10a467 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
 {
        /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
        if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) ||
-                       (size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE))) {
+                       (size < 512))) {
                printk(KERN_ERR "getblk(): invalid block size %d requested\n",
                                        size);
                printk(KERN_ERR "logical block size: %d\n",



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-30 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-10 10:29 [PATCH 0/5] enable bs > ps for block devices hare
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs/mpage: use blocks_per_folio instead of blocks_per_page hare
2024-05-10 22:19   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11  9:12     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs/mpage: avoid negative shift for large blocksize hare
2024-05-10 22:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11  9:13     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize hare
2024-05-10 22:25   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11  9:15     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-11 22:57     ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-11 22:54   ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes hare
2024-05-10 22:35   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11  9:18     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-11  5:07   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-11  7:04   ` kernel test robot
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme: enable logical block size > PAGE_SIZE hare
2024-05-10 22:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11  9:18     ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-11 23:11     ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-11 23:09   ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-11 23:30     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11 23:51       ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-12  2:43         ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-12  9:16           ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-13 16:07             ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-13 21:05               ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-13 23:07                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-24 10:04                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-14  5:08               ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-13 13:43           ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-13 14:32             ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-11 23:12 ` [PATCH 0/5] enable bs > ps for block devices Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-30 13:37 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240530133721.jqbr7jkknnkxdsli@quentin \
    --to=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hare@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox