From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: hare@kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pankaj Raghav <kernel@pankajraghav.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 23:25:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zj6e95dncIn-Zrlh@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510102906.51844-4-hare@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:29:04PM +0200, hare@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
>
> We now can support blocksizes larger than PAGE_SIZE, so lift
> the restriction.
Do we need to make this conditional on a CONFIG option? Not all
architectures support THP yet ... which means they don't support
large folios. We should fix that, but it is well below the cutoff line
on my todo list.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-10 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 10:29 [PATCH 0/5] enable bs > ps for block devices hare
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs/mpage: use blocks_per_folio instead of blocks_per_page hare
2024-05-10 22:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11 9:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs/mpage: avoid negative shift for large blocksize hare
2024-05-10 22:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11 9:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize hare
2024-05-10 22:25 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-05-11 9:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-11 22:57 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-11 22:54 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes hare
2024-05-10 22:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11 9:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-11 5:07 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-11 7:04 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-10 10:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme: enable logical block size > PAGE_SIZE hare
2024-05-10 22:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11 9:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-11 23:11 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-11 23:09 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-11 23:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11 23:51 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-12 2:43 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-12 9:16 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-13 16:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-13 21:05 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-13 23:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-24 10:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-14 5:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-13 13:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-13 14:32 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-11 23:12 ` [PATCH 0/5] enable bs > ps for block devices Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-30 13:37 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zj6e95dncIn-Zrlh@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox