public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	<kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-rdma: set ack timeout of RoCE to 262ms
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:50:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83992e8f-b18a-ccd3-e0ee-a5802043f161@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220821062016.GA26553@lst.de>



On 2022/8/21 14:20, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 03:58:25PM +0800, Chao Leng wrote:
>> Now the ack timeout of RoCE is 2 second(2^(18+1)*4us=2 second). In the
>> case of low concurrency, if some packets lost due to network abnormal
>> such as network rerouting, Optical fiber signal interference, etc,
>> it will wait 2 second to try retransmitting the lost packets.
>> As a result, the I/O latency is greater than 2 seconds.
>> The I/O latency is so long for real-time transaction service. Indeed we
>> do not have to wait so long time to make sure that packets are lost.
>> Setting the ack timeout to 262ms(2^(15+1)*4us=262ms) is sufficient.
> 
> I'll leave people more familar with RoCE to judge the merits of this
> change, but I really want a comment explaining the choice in the
> source code.
Now the TCP retransmission timeout interval is 250ms, and this setting
has been maintained for many years.
The network quality of rdma is better than that of common Ethernet.
That is the reason to set 262ms as the default ack timeout.
Adding a module parameter may be a better option.
> 
> .
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-22  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-19  7:58 [PATCH] nvme-rdma: set ack timeout of RoCE to 262ms Chao Leng
2022-08-21  6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-22  9:50   ` Chao Leng [this message]
2022-08-22 15:30     ` Max Gurtovoy
2022-08-25  9:58       ` Chao Leng
2022-08-28 14:57         ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-08-29  8:05           ` Chao Leng
2022-08-29  9:06             ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-08-29 13:15               ` Chao Leng
2022-10-10  9:12                 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-14  0:05                   ` Max Gurtovoy
2022-10-14  2:15                     ` Chao Leng
2022-11-16  2:24                       ` Chao Leng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83992e8f-b18a-ccd3-e0ee-a5802043f161@huawei.com \
    --to=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox