From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] nvmet: pci-epf: Clear completion queue IRQ flag on delete
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 15:14:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aB3_ownuFAlmOH5J@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <457cdc67-443f-4fae-b029-7bbe5b66ff45@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 08:13:22AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 5/8/25 10:07 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 03:57:42PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> >> The function nvmet_pci_epf_delete_cq() unconditionnally calls
> >
> > s/unconditionnally/unconditionally/
> >
> >
> >> nvmet_pci_epf_remove_irq_vector() even for completion queues that do not
> >> have interrupts enabled. Furthermore, for completion queues that do
> >> have IRQ enabled, deleting and re-creating the completion queue leaves
> >> the flag NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED set, even if the completion queue
> >> is being re-created with IRQ disabled.
> >>
> >> Fix these issues by calling nvmet_pci_epf_remove_irq_vector() only if
> >> NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED is set and make sure to always clear that
> >> flag.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 0faa0fe6f90e ("nvmet: New NVMe PCI endpoint function target driver")
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> >> index 7fab7f3d79b7..d5442991f2fb 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
> >> @@ -1344,7 +1344,8 @@ static u16 nvmet_pci_epf_delete_cq(struct nvmet_ctrl *tctrl, u16 cqid)
> >>
> >> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&cq->work);
> >> nvmet_pci_epf_drain_queue(cq);
> >> - nvmet_pci_epf_remove_irq_vector(ctrl, cq->vector);
> >> + if (test_and_clear_bit(NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED, &cq->flags))
> >> + nvmet_pci_epf_remove_irq_vector(ctrl, cq->vector);
> >
> > I agree that we should only call nvmet_pci_epf_remove_irq_vector() if
> > NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED is set.
> >
> > However, it looks a bit weird to explicitly only clear only this flag bit.
> > What about the other flag bits?
>
> NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_LIVE is cleared in the same function in the same manner. The
> only other flag is NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED, which this patch clears.
>
> > I would have expected a memset() of flags, or flags = 0; in either
> > .create_cq/.create_sq, or in .delete_cq/.delete_sq.
You patch looks fine, I was just thinking that it would be slightly more robust
to do flags = 0; in e.g. .create_cq/.create_sq, or .delete_cq/.delete_sq.
That way, we remove the possibility of ever introducing a similar bug to what
this patch fixes. (I.e if we ever add a new flag, we will not need to remember
to also add code that explicitly clears the bit for that new flag, since
flags = 0; clears all flags in one go.)
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 6:57 [PATCH 0/4] nvmet pci-epf fixes Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 6:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvmet: pci-epf: Clear completion queue IRQ flag on delete Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 13:07 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-08 23:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-05-09 13:14 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-05-08 6:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not fall back to using INTX if not supported Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 13:07 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-08 23:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 6:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvmet: pci-epf: Cleanup nvmet_pci_epf_raise_irq() Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 13:07 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-08 23:16 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 6:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvmet: pci-epf: Improve debug message Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 13:07 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aB3_ownuFAlmOH5J@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox