Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	iain@orangesquash.org.uk,
	"Shyam Sundar S K" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
	"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 2/2] PCI: Add a quirk for AMD PCIe root ports w/ USB4 controllers
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:09:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231003170930.GA678318@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1560d56-881b-4f86-b25f-63f351d10b8d@amd.com>

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 09:05:55PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 9/29/2023 14:44, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> ...

> > This is a lot of hassle to look for USB4 devices below the Root Port.
> > You said earlier that these Root Ports *only* connect to xHCI and
> > USB4 [1].
> 
> That's correct, but the part that I believe you're missing is that there are
> multiple "instances" of this PCI device ID on a failing system.
> 
> On an OEM Phoenix laptop in front of me I see 3 instances of 1022:14eb:
> 00:08.1, 00:08.2, and 00:08.3.
> 
> > If that's the case, why even bother with the search?
> > Why not just clear PCI_PM_CAP_PME_D3hot and PCI_PM_CAP_PME_D3cold
> > unconditionally, e.g., the possible patch below?
> 
> Only the one with the USB4 controller (in this system it's at 00:08.3) has
> the problem.
> 
> So I believe the proposal you have below will apply the policy to too many
> ports.

Ah, thanks for clearing that up; I've been laboring under that
misapprehension for a long time.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-03 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-20  3:27 [PATCH v20 0/2] Add quirk for PCIe root port on AMD systems Mario Limonciello
2023-09-20  3:27 ` [PATCH v20 1/2] PCI: Move the `PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_USB4` definition to common header Mario Limonciello
2023-09-20  3:27 ` [PATCH v20 2/2] PCI: Add a quirk for AMD PCIe root ports w/ USB4 controllers Mario Limonciello
2023-09-25  5:20   ` Mika Westerberg
2023-09-27 18:40     ` Mario Limonciello
2023-09-29 19:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-09-30  2:05     ` Mario Limonciello
2023-10-03 17:09       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-09-30  9:24   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-02 16:27     ` Mario Limonciello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231003170930.GA678318@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=iain@orangesquash.org.uk \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox