From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Krzysztof Wilczy??ski <kw@linux.com>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Niklas Schnelle" <niks@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-linus v3 1/2] PCI: Honor Max Link Speed when determining supported speeds
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:41:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2POKvvGX7HZmqtP@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241218234357.GA1444967@rocinante>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 08:43:57AM +0900, Krzysztof Wilczy??ski wrote:
> > > The GENMASK() macro used herein specifies 0 as lowest bit, even though
> > > the Supported Link Speeds Vector ends at bit 1. This is done on purpose
> > > to avoid a GENMASK(0, 1) macro if Max Link Speed is zero. That macro
> > > would be invalid as the lowest bit is greater than the highest bit.
> > > Ilpo has witnessed a zero Max Link Speed on Root Complex Integrated
> > > Endpoints in particular, so it does occur in practice.
> >
> > Thanks for adding this extra information.
> >
> > I'd also add reference to r6.2 section 7.5.3 which states those registers
> > are required for RPs, Switch Ports, Bridges, and Endpoints _that are not
> > RCiEPs_. My reading is that implies they're not required from RCiEPs.
>
> Let me know how you would like to update the commit message. I will do it
> directly on the branch.
FWIW, I edited the commit message like this on my local branch:
-Endpoints in particular, so it does occur in practice.
+Endpoints in particular, so it does occur in practice. (The Link
+Capabilities Register is optional on RCiEPs per PCIe r6.2 sec 7.5.3.)
In other words, I just added the sentence in parentheses.
But maybe Ilpo has another wording preference... :)
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-19 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 9:51 [PATCH for-linus v3 0/2] Fix bwctrl boot hang Lukas Wunner
2024-12-17 9:51 ` [PATCH for-linus v3 1/2] PCI: Honor Max Link Speed when determining supported speeds Lukas Wunner
2024-12-17 11:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-18 23:43 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-12-19 7:41 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2024-12-19 11:05 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-19 16:37 ` Krzysztof Wilczy??ski
[not found] ` <CABhMZUWP1LN2ZX7oAaW4oJywC+Zfo4Y0p4ep7NJkkgGcVsM+hg@mail.gmail.com>
2024-12-20 8:57 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-12-17 9:51 ` [PATCH for-linus v3 2/2] PCI/bwctrl: Enable only if more than one speed is supported Lukas Wunner
2024-12-17 11:35 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-18 23:48 ` [PATCH for-linus v3 0/2] Fix bwctrl boot hang Krzysztof Wilczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2POKvvGX7HZmqtP@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=niks@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox