Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>, Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 7/9] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:42:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0636b71e-acb8-4e9e-bf55-2343471e52bd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610112114.GD187714@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>


On 6/10/2026 7:21 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 04:50:45PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
>> On 6/10/2026 4:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 01:02:20PM +0800, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>>>> On SPR guests where pebs_baseline is not advertised, running:
>>>>
>>>> $ ./perf record -e cpu/event=0x00,umask=0x01,i\
>>>> 	 name=INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST/p -c 10000 sleep 1
>>>>
>>>> can trigger:
>>>>
>>>> unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x3f1 ... in\
>>>> 	 intel_pmu_pebs_enable_all()
>>>>
>>>> Root cause:
>>>> SPR-specific PEBS constraints allow fixed-counter scheduling,
>>>> for example INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST on fixed counter 0. In guests without
>>>> pebs_baseline, KVM does not support PEBS sampling on fixed counters,
>>>> so enabling such events reaches an invalid MSR programming path.
>>>>
>>>> Fix:
>>>> Drop fixed-counter entries from the PEBS constraint table. Without
>>>> pebs_baseline, those fixed-counter PEBS events now resolve to empty
>>>> constraints and are not scheduled/enabled, avoiding the warning and the
>>>> broken guest PEBS path.
>>>>
>>>> This is safe because, in pebs_baseline-capable cases, PEBS constraint
>>>> lookup already falls back to non-PEBS constraints when needed, and
>>>> fixed-counter constraints are effectively shared there.
>>> I am confused, this works outside of KVM? (It appears to work fine on my
>>> spr).. so removing this to fix some guest only issue seems wrong.
>> The reason that it works on bare metal is currently the constraint lookup
>> would fallback into non-PEBS constraints if there is no matched entry in
>> the PEBS constraints as long as the PEBS supports sampling on all counters
>> including fixed counters (what the flag "PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL" indicates), like
>> the below code shows.
>>
>> ```
> Why the markdown nonsense? You're not an LLM, right? And you all know
> I'm reading this in mutt. Its just visual noise.
>
> Anyway, please clarify the Changelog.

Sorry for the visual noise. I'm using the thunderbird mail client,  not
sure why the markdown doesn't work.

Sure. I would rewrite the change log and increase more details. Thanks.



  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09  5:02 [Patch v2 0/9] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 1/9] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 2/9] perf/x86: Introduce is_x86_pmu() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 3/9] perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base on rdpmc user disable state Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 14:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  1:47     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 4/9] perf/x86/intel: Fallback to sw branch type decoding if no hw decoding Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 10:04     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 14:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  1:53     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 5/9] perf/x86/intel: Drop LBR entries whose privilege level mismatches br_sel Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  9:40     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 14:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  1:57     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 6/9] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  9:44     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-10  8:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  8:34     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 7/9] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS Dapeng Mi
2026-06-10  8:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  8:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10  8:50     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-10 11:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 11:42         ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 8/9] perf/core: Fix kernel register info leak via hardware skid Dapeng Mi
2026-06-10  9:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-09  5:02 ` [Patch v2 9/9] perf/core: Check kernel access when kernel callchains are requested Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09  5:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09  9:49     ` Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0636b71e-acb8-4e9e-bf55-2343471e52bd@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox