From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/17] perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch
Date: Sat, 02 May 2026 07:56:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260502075616.4492CC19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260502065935.291960-2-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Uninitialized stack memory is leaked to the perf.data file and cached in the environment.
- [High] Lossy canonicalization of the architecture string breaks 64-bit detection for old and new perf.data files.
- [Medium] If strdup() fails during process_arch(), env->arch is silently left as NULL.
--
commit 8073d9a9766717469f9a62174c92bb53c77a0df4
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch
This commit introduces a helper to lazily compute the e_machine and update the
perf_env's arch calculation. It updates the session to use the new helper and
modifies how the perf data file header extracts the e_machine and e_flags.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c
> index 1e54e2c86360..4ff4caab3b32 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/env.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c
[ ... ]
> +uint16_t perf_env__e_machine_nocache(struct perf_env *env, uint32_t *e_flags)
> +{
> + uint16_t e_machine = EM_HOST;
> +
> + if (env)
> + e_machine = perf_arch_to_e_machine(env->arch, env->kernel_is_64_bit);
> +
> + if (e_flags && e_machine == EM_HOST)
> + *e_flags = EF_HOST;
> +
> + return e_machine;
> +}
> +
> +uint16_t perf_env__e_machine(struct perf_env *env, uint32_t *e_flags)
> +{
> + uint16_t e_machine;
> + uint32_t local_e_flags;
Could local_e_flags be used uninitialized here?
If e_machine != EM_HOST in perf_env__e_machine_nocache(), *e_flags is not
written to, which leaves local_e_flags uninitialized.
> +
> + if (env && env->e_machine != EM_NONE) {
> + if (e_flags)
> + *e_flags = env->e_flags;
> +
> + return env->e_machine;
> + }
> + e_machine = perf_env__e_machine_nocache(env, &local_e_flags);
> + if (env) {
> + env->e_machine = e_machine;
> + env->e_flags = local_e_flags;
If local_e_flags is uninitialized, does this leak stack memory into the
environment?
> + }
> + if (e_flags)
> + *e_flags = local_e_flags;
> +
> + return e_machine;
> }
[ ... ]
> const char *perf_env__arch(struct perf_env *env)
> {
[ ... ]
> + /*
> + * Lazily compute/allocate arch. The e_machine may have been
> + * read from a data file and so may not be EM_HOST.
> + */
> + e_machine = perf_env__e_machine(env, /*e_flags=*/NULL);
> + arch = e_machine_to_perf_arch(e_machine);
> + env->arch = strdup(arch);
If strdup() fails due to memory exhaustion, could env->arch be left as NULL?
> + /*
> + * Avoid potential crashes on the arch string if memory allocation in
> + * strdup fails and NULL were to be returned.
> + */
> + return env->arch ?: arch;
> }
>
> #if defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index f30e48eb3fc3..8d5152bde25d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
[ ... ]
> -static int write_e_machine(struct feat_fd *ff,
> - struct evlist *evlist __maybe_unused)
> +static int write_e_machine(struct feat_fd *ff, struct evlist *evlist)
> {
> /* e_machine expanded from 16 to 32-bits for alignment. */
> uint32_t e_flags;
Could e_flags be leaked to the perf.data file here?
If no threads supply a valid ELF machine and the fallback logic invokes
perf_env__e_machine_nocache() returning e_machine != EM_HOST, e_flags
may remain uninitialized stack garbage.
> - uint32_t e_machine = EM_HOST;
> + uint32_t e_machine = perf_session__e_machine(evlist->session, &e_flags);
> int ret;
>
> ret = do_write(ff, &e_machine, sizeof(e_machine));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - return do_write(ff, &e_machine, sizeof(e_machine));
> + return do_write(ff, &e_flags, sizeof(e_flags));
Does this write the potentially uninitialized stack memory to the file header?
> }
[ ... ]
> +static int process_arch(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
> +{
> + uint16_t saved_e_machine = ff->ph->env.e_machine;
> +
> + free(ff->ph->env.arch);
> + ff->ph->env.arch = do_read_string(ff);
> + if (!ff->ph->env.arch)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + /*
> + * Make the arch string canonical by computing the e_machine from it,
> + * then turning the e_machine back into an arch string.
> + */
> + ff->ph->env.e_machine = EM_NONE;
> + if (perf_env__e_machine(&ff->ph->env, /*e_flags=*/NULL) != EM_NONE) {
> + zfree(&ff->ph->env.arch);
> + perf_env__arch(&ff->ph->env);
If strdup() failed inside perf_env__arch(), could ff->ph->env.arch be left
as NULL, while this function incorrectly returns 0 (success) leading to
later NULL pointer dereferences?
Additionally, does this canonicalization strip architecture suffixes like "64"?
For legacy perf.data files lacking the HEADER_E_MACHINE feature,
saved_e_machine would be restored to EM_NONE. If the string is canonicalized
from "x86_64" to "x86" (based on e_machine_to_perf_arch()), subsequent calls to
perf_env__init_kernel_mode() will check str_ends_with(env->arch, "64"). Because
it's now "x86", the kernel_is_64_bit flag will be set to 0.
Does this break 64-bit detection and parsing for 64-bit recordings?
> + }
> + ff->ph->env.e_machine = saved_e_machine;
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260502065935.291960-1-irogers@google.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-02 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 11:38 [PATCH v2] perf symbol: Remove psw_idle() from list of idle symbols Thomas Richter
2026-02-19 11:55 ` Jan Polensky
2026-02-23 21:46 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-02-23 23:14 ` Arnaldo Melo
2026-03-02 18:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-02 19:44 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-04 14:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-02 23:43 ` [PATCH v1] perf symbol: Lazily compute idle and use the perf_env Ian Rogers
2026-03-24 17:14 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-25 6:58 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-03-25 15:58 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-25 16:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Ian Rogers
2026-03-26 7:20 ` Honglei Wang
2026-03-26 15:11 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-26 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] perf symbol/env: ELF machine clean up and lazy idle computation Ian Rogers
2026-03-26 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch Ian Rogers
2026-03-26 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf symbol: Lazily compute idle and use the perf_env Ian Rogers
2026-03-27 6:56 ` Honglei Wang
2026-03-27 4:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] perf symbol/env: ELF machine clean up and lazy idle computation Ian Rogers
2026-03-27 4:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch Ian Rogers
2026-04-06 5:05 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-06 15:36 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-27 4:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] perf symbol: Lazily compute idle and use the perf_env Ian Rogers
2026-04-06 5:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-06 16:11 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-06 17:09 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] perf symbol/env: ELF machine clean up and lazy idle computation Ian Rogers
2026-04-06 17:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch Ian Rogers
2026-04-06 17:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] perf env: Add helper to lazily compute the os_release Ian Rogers
2026-04-06 17:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] perf symbol: Lazily compute idle and use the perf_env Ian Rogers
2026-04-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] perf symbol/env: ELF machine clean up and lazy idle computation Ian Rogers
2026-04-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch Ian Rogers
2026-04-09 23:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-01 18:20 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] perf symbol/env: ELF machine clean up and lazy idle computation Ian Rogers
2026-05-01 18:20 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-01 18:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-01 18:20 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] perf env: Add helper to lazily compute the os_release Ian Rogers
2026-05-01 19:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-01 18:20 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] perf symbol: Add setters for bitfields sharing a byte to avoid concurrent update issues Ian Rogers
2026-05-01 19:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-01 18:20 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] perf symbol: Lazily compute idle and use a global lock for updates Ian Rogers
2026-05-01 20:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 00/17] perf symbol/env: ELF machine clean up and lazy idle computation Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 01/17] perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 02/17] perf tests topology: Switch env->arch use to env->e_machine Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 03/17] perf capstone: Determine architecture from e_machine Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 04/17] perf print_insn: Use e_machine for fallback IP length check Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 05/17] perf machine: Use perf_env e_machine rather than arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 06/17] perf sample-raw: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 07/17] perf sort: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 08/17] perf symbol: Avoid use of machine__is Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 09/17] perf arch common: Use perf_env e_machine rather than arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 10/17] perf header: In print_pmu_caps use perf_env e_machine Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 11/17] perf c2c: Use perf_env e_machine rather than arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 12/17] perf lock-contention: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 13/17] perf env: Refactor perf_env__arch_strerrno Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 14/17] perf env: Remove unused perf_env__raw_arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 15/17] perf env: Add helper to lazily compute the os_release Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 16/17] perf symbol: Add setters for bitfields sharing a byte to avoid concurrent update issues Ian Rogers
2026-05-02 7:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-02 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 17/17] perf symbol: Lazily compute idle and use a global lock for updates Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 00/18] perf symbol/env: ELF machine clean up and lazy idle computation Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] perf env: Add perf_env__e_machine helper and use in perf_env__arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-04 1:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] perf tests topology: Switch env->arch use to env->e_machine Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] perf env, dso, thread: Add _endian variants for e_machine helpers Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] perf capstone: Determine architecture from e_machine Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] perf print_insn: Use e_machine for fallback IP length check Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] perf symbol: Avoid use of machine__is Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] perf machine: Use perf_env e_machine rather than arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] perf sample-raw: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] perf sort: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] perf arch common: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] perf header: In print_pmu_caps use perf_env e_machine Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] perf c2c: Use perf_env e_machine rather than arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] perf lock-contention: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] perf env: Refactor perf_env__arch_strerrno Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] perf env: Remove unused perf_env__raw_arch Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] perf env: Add helper to lazily compute the os_release Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] perf symbol: Add setters for bitfields sharing a byte to avoid concurrent update issues Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:22 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] perf symbol: Lazily compute idle Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] perf env: Add helper to lazily compute the os_release Ian Rogers
2026-04-09 23:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-09 23:06 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] perf symbol: Lazily compute idle and use the perf_env Ian Rogers
2026-04-10 0:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-03-27 6:00 ` [PATCH v2] perf tests task-analyzer: Write test files to tmpdir Ian Rogers
2026-03-31 7:22 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-03-31 17:58 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-01 3:41 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260502075616.4492CC19425@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox