Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v9 10/24] perf/x86/intel: Consolidate PMU capability updates
Date: Mon,  6 Jul 2026 09:54:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706015439.3040804-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706015439.3040804-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

Currently, the PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS capability is set in two
different places: intel_ds_pebs_init() and __intel_update_pmu_caps()
for adaptive and architectural PEBS. The upcoming XSAVES-based SIMD
register sampling will also require setting and validating this
capability. Managing it across multiple locations introduces
unnecessary complexity and potential conflicts.

To centralize and simplify the PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS logic,
consolidate its initialization into a single helper function,
__intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(), handling both adaptive and
architectural PEBS.

Additionally, optimize the capability update paths by moving the
initialization of intel_cap.capabilities out of the update_pmu_cap()
helper. The helper is guarded by archPerfmonExt support, whereas
intel_cap.capabilities is independent of it.

Finally, introduce a new wrapper function, intel_update_pmu_caps(),
to cleanly encapsulate all these PMU capability updates.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c   |  1 -
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 2e658b4bc83a..11a0c4dd2026 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -6143,19 +6143,27 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_extra_regs(struct extra_reg *extra_regs);
 
 static inline bool intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap(void)
 {
-	/* The Perf Metric (Bit 15) is always cleared */
-	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_METEORLAKE ||
+	/*
+	 * The Perf Metric (Bit 15) is always cleared on P-core of
+	 * PRL and MTL. Details can be found in RPL018 Errata Details.
+	 */
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_RAPTORLAKE ||
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_P ||
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_S ||
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_METEORLAKE ||
 	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_METEORLAKE_L)
 		return true;
 
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline void __intel_update_pmu_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
+static inline void __intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
 	struct pmu *dest_pmu = pmu ? pmu : x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id());
+	u64 caps = hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).caps;
 
-	if (hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).caps & ARCH_PEBS_VECR_XMM)
+	if ((x86_pmu.arch_pebs && (caps & ARCH_PEBS_VECR_XMM)) ||
+	    (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 4 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline))
 		dest_pmu->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS;
 }
 
@@ -6179,7 +6187,7 @@ static inline void __intel_update_large_pebs_flags(struct pmu *pmu)
 
 #define counter_mask(_gp, _fixed) ((_gp) | ((u64)(_fixed) << INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED))
 
-static void update_pmu_cap(struct pmu *pmu)
+static void update_pmu_cap_from_perfmonext(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
 	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 	union cpuid35_eax eax_0;
@@ -6227,21 +6235,34 @@ static void update_pmu_cap(struct pmu *pmu)
 		hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).counters = pebs_mask;
 		hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).pdists = pdists_mask;
 
-		if (WARN_ON((pebs_mask | pdists_mask) & ~cntrs_mask)) {
+		if (WARN_ON((pebs_mask | pdists_mask) & ~cntrs_mask))
 			x86_pmu.arch_pebs = 0;
-		} else {
-			__intel_update_pmu_caps(pmu);
+		else
 			__intel_update_large_pebs_flags(pmu);
-		}
 	} else {
 		WARN_ON(x86_pmu.arch_pebs == 1);
 		x86_pmu.arch_pebs = 0;
 	}
+}
 
-	if (!intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap()) {
-		/* Perf Metric (Bit 15) and PEBS via PT (Bit 16) are hybrid enumeration */
-		rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, hybrid(pmu, intel_cap).capabilities);
+static void intel_update_pmu_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
+{
+	if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON_EXT))
+		update_pmu_cap_from_perfmonext(pmu);
+
+	if (is_hybrid() && this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM)) {
+		rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES,
+		       hybrid(pmu, intel_cap).capabilities);
+
+		/*
+		 * Restore perf_metrics on platforms with broken
+		 * perf_capablities.
+		 */
+		if (intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap() &&
+		    hybrid_pmu(pmu)->pmu_type == hybrid_big)
+			hybrid(pmu, intel_cap).perf_metrics = 1;
 	}
+	__intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(pmu);
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
@@ -6325,8 +6346,7 @@ static bool init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
 	if (!cpumask_empty(&pmu->supported_cpus))
 		goto end;
 
-	if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON_EXT))
-		update_pmu_cap(&pmu->pmu);
+	intel_update_pmu_caps(&pmu->pmu);
 
 	intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(pmu);
 
@@ -6395,8 +6415,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 		}
 	}
 
-	__intel_update_pmu_caps(cpuc->pmu);
-
 	if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
 		return;
 
@@ -8821,8 +8839,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 	 * from the leaf 0xa. The core specific update will be done later
 	 * when a new type is online.
 	 */
-	if (!is_hybrid() && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON_EXT))
-		update_pmu_cap(NULL);
+	if (!is_hybrid())
+		intel_update_pmu_caps(NULL);
 
 	if (x86_pmu.arch_pebs) {
 		static_call_update(intel_pmu_disable_event_ext,
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 7b69f8c8d0c2..78b9c0dcb14d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -3396,7 +3396,6 @@ static void __init intel_ds_pebs_init(void)
 				x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL;
 				x86_pmu.pebs_capable = ~0ULL;
 				pebs_qual = "-baseline";
-				x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS;
 			} else {
 				/* Only basic record supported */
 				x86_pmu.large_pebs_flags &=
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  1:54 [Patch v9 00/24] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 01/24] perf/x86: Fix two error-path and hybrid PMU guard issues Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:05     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 02/24] perf/x86: Move hybrid PMU initialization before x86_pmu_starting_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:33     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 03/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 04/24] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 05/24] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific function definitions Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 06/24] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in NMI handlers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:43     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 07/24] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:09     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 08/24] x86/fpu: Add update_fpu_state_and_flag() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:15     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 09/24] perf: Move and enhance has_extended_regs() for arch-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 11/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for non-PEBS events Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:47     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 12/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 13/24] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 14/24] perf/x86: Support XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  6:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 15/24] perf/x86: Support YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 16/24] perf/x86: Support ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 17/24] perf/x86: Support OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 18/24] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 19/24] perf/x86: Support eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 20/24] perf/x86: Support SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 21/24] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 22/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 23/24] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 24/24] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  5:04   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260706015439.3040804-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox