From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v9 24/24] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 05:04:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706050412.999B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706015439.3040804-25-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Events without preceding valid records in a corrupted PEBS buffer are permanently stalled.
--
commit e2dd3df4b73a7bfac8a1332ea38906750253ef38
Author: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size
This patch adds a sanity check for corrupted PEBS fragment sizes to prevent
potential infinite loops. If a corrupted fragment is detected, the entire
PEBS record and all subsequent records are dropped to ensure data integrity.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> index b38aed4f62b4c..7a8e619055393 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3244,7 +3261,8 @@ static __always_inline void
> __intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(struct pt_regs *iregs,
> struct pt_regs *regs,
> struct perf_sample_data *data,
> - u64 mask, short *counts, void **last,
> + u64 mask, short *counts,
> + void **last, bool corrupted,
> setup_fn setup_sample)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> @@ -3258,7 +3276,7 @@ __intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(struct pt_regs *iregs,
> event = cpuc->events[bit];
>
> __intel_pmu_pebs_last_event(event, iregs, regs, data, last[bit],
> - counts[bit], setup_sample);
> + counts[bit], corrupted, setup_sample);
> }
>
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this logic permanently stall PMU
profiling for events without preceding valid records in a corrupted buffer?
In arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c:__intel_pmu_handle_last_pebs_record(), we skip
processing if the count is zero:
for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&mask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
if (!counts[bit])
continue;
...
If a corrupted PEBS record is detected (e.g., via the newly added at >= top
bounds checks) and the code exits the drain loop early, events that had no
valid records parsed prior to the corruption will have a count of zero.
Because these events are skipped here, __intel_pmu_pebs_last_event() is never
called, preventing intel_pmu_save_and_restart() from re-arming their hardware
counters. Furthermore, since handle_pmi_common() explicitly masks PEBS events
out of the global status, the generic NMI handler will also ignore them.
Could this lead to the hardware counters remaining disabled, stopping
profiling until the session is recreated?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706015439.3040804-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com?part=24
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 1:54 [Patch v9 00/24] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 01/24] perf/x86: Fix two error-path and hybrid PMU guard issues Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:05 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 02/24] perf/x86: Move hybrid PMU initialization before x86_pmu_starting_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:33 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 03/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 04/24] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 05/24] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific function definitions Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 06/24] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in NMI handlers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:43 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 07/24] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 9:09 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 08/24] x86/fpu: Add update_fpu_state_and_flag() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 9:15 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 09/24] perf: Move and enhance has_extended_regs() for arch-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 10/24] perf/x86/intel: Consolidate PMU capability updates Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 11/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for non-PEBS events Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 9:47 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 12/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 13/24] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 14/24] perf/x86: Support XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 6:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 15/24] perf/x86: Support YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 16/24] perf/x86: Support ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 17/24] perf/x86: Support OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 18/24] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 19/24] perf/x86: Support eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 20/24] perf/x86: Support SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 21/24] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 22/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 23/24] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 24/24] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 5:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706050412.999B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox