From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
robin.murphy@arm.com, icheng@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 06/11] cxl/pci: Add the PMUs after configuring events
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 02:05:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922020517.46227d0a@jic23-hlaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805155911.1304807-7-dave.jiang@intel.com>
On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 08:59:06 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
> cxl_pci_probe() adds the CPMU instances before configuring the event
> interrupts. Both take an MSI/MSI-X vector the device names in its own
> capability registers, and the spec lets a device point several capabilities
> at one message number, so the two can collide.
>
> They do not fail the same way. A failed devm_cxl_pmu_add() only breaks out
> of the loop, while a failed cxl_event_config() aborts probe and the memory
> device never appears. Going PMUs-first therefore lets a peripheral facility
> take the vector and deny it to one that matters.
>
> Configure events first, so a collision costs the PMU rather than the
> memdev. Return 0 explicitly afterwards, since rc still holds any PMU error
> that cxl_event_config() used to overwrite on the way past.
>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - New patch, ahead of the PMU dropping IRQF_SHARED. Without this that
> change can turn a shared vector into a probe failure for the whole
> memdev rather than a missing PMU (sashiko-bot).
Make sense. Anyone crazy enough to share this interrupt gets to keep
the pieces.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 15:59 [RESEND PATCH v4 00/11] perf/cxlpmu: Misc sashiko raised issues fixes Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 01/11] perf/cxl: Program the requested event group on configurable counters Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 02/11] perf/cxl: Clear stale event fields before reprogramming a counter Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 0:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 03/11] perf/cxl: Fix the counter overflow delta fixup Dave Jiang
2026-09-22 0:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 04/11] perf/cxl: Accept an overflow interrupt on MSI message number 0 Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 05/11] perf/cxl: Split the MSI vector out of info->irq Dave Jiang
2026-09-22 1:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 06/11] cxl/pci: Add the PMUs after configuring events Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:51 ` Alison Schofield
2026-09-22 1:05 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 07/11] perf/cxl: Don't share the overflow interrupt, and keep it pinned Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 08/11] perf/cxl: Unfreeze counters after handling an overflow interrupt Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:35 ` Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 09/11] perf/cxl: Validate the hardware-reported counter width Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 10/11] perf/cxl: Don't log through pmu.dev in the overflow interrupt handler Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 15:59 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 11/11] perf/cxl: Clear stale overflow status before using a counter Dave Jiang
2026-08-05 16:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 1:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-15 22:43 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 00/11] perf/cxlpmu: Misc sashiko raised issues fixes Ian Rogers
2026-09-18 16:50 ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-22 1:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-04 22:09 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922020517.46227d0a@jic23-hlaptop \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox