From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: "Chen, Zide" <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SRF
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:11:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33873753-e44a-47a6-8a54-1975d62df7ed@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2ad411c-e844-493e-8c50-d5821588170d@intel.com>
On 5/20/2026 6:23 AM, Chen, Zide wrote:
>
> On 5/15/2026 11:11 PM, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> Update perf hard-coded event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for
>> Sierra Forest according to the latest SRF perfmon events (V1.17).
>>
>> SRF has same uarch (crestmont) as MTL E-core and shares same perf
>> events, so directly apply the crestmont perf events.
> Nit: Crestmont.
Sure. Thanks.
>> SRF perfmon events:
>> https://github.com/intel/perfmon/blob/main/SRF/events/sierraforest_core.json
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
> Reviewed-by: zide.chen@intel.com
>
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> index 587167dbb98f..e1c6fb127f10 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> @@ -8101,8 +8101,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>>
>> case INTEL_ATOM_CRESTMONT:
>> case INTEL_ATOM_CRESTMONT_X:
>> - intel_pmu_init_grt(NULL);
>> - x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_cmt_extra_regs;
>> + intel_pmu_init_cmt(NULL);
>> intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_cmt();
>> x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = cmt_latency_data;
>> x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = cmt_get_event_constraints;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 6:11 [PATCH 00/11] perf/x86/intel: Fix inaccurate hard-coded event configurations Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ICX Dapeng Mi
2026-05-19 22:19 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-20 1:10 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SPR Dapeng Mi
2026-05-19 22:25 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-20 2:08 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for DMR Dapeng Mi
2026-05-19 22:19 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ADL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 7:11 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-19 22:26 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for MTL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for LNL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for ARL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 7:12 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for PTL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for NVL Dapeng Mi
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for SRF Dapeng Mi
2026-05-19 22:23 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-20 2:11 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-05-15 6:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints and cache_extra_regs[] for CWF Dapeng Mi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33873753-e44a-47a6-8a54-1975d62df7ed@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox