From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Breno Rodrigues Alves" <breno3011alves@gmail.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] perf/tests: convert check_no_patterns_found.pl to Python
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:03:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-176144@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261018125641.23064-4-breno3011alves@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf tests: check_no_patterns_found.py is unused and not installed
- [Low] perf tests: missing EOF newline in check_no_patterns_found.py breaks PYLINT=1
--
commit d6b15fdc56a31f78fa7365cb6aafd5034b2a393d
Author: Breno Rodrigues Alves <breno3011alves@gmail.com>
perf/tests: convert check_no_patterns_found.pl to Python
This commit adds a Python 3 implementation of check_no_patterns_found.pl
under tools/perf/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.py.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.py b/tools/perf/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.py
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000000000..0e5d931b903a2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +#!/usr/bin/env python3
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
[Severity: Medium]
Should this commit also update the existing callers, remove
tools/perf/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.pl, and install the new
script?
All existing call sites in the test suite still invoke
check_no_patterns_found.pl:
tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe/test_adding_kernel.sh:
"$DIR_PATH/../common/check_no_patterns_found.pl" \
"$RE_SEGFAULT" < $LOGS_DIR/adding_kernel_nonexisting.err
tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe/test_basic.sh:
"$DIR_PATH/../common/check_no_patterns_found.pl" \
"No manual entry for" < $LOGS_DIR/basic_helpmsg.err
tools/perf/tests/shell/base_report/test_basic.sh:
"$DIR_PATH/../common/check_no_patterns_found.pl" \
"No manual entry for" < $LOGS_DIR/basic_helpmsg.err
In addition, the install-tests target in tools/perf/Makefile.perf only
installs *.sh and *.pl files from tests/shell/common:
tools/perf/Makefile.perf:
$(INSTALL) -d -m 755 '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/common'; \
$(INSTALL) tests/shell/common/*.sh '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/common'; \
$(INSTALL) tests/shell/common/*.pl '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/common'; \
Without updating the callers and Makefile.perf, check_no_patterns_found.py is
never executed or installed.
[ ... ]
> +if __name__ == "__main__":
> + sys.exit(main(sys.argv[1:]))
> \ No newline at end of file
[Severity: Low]
Does the missing trailing newline at the end of check_no_patterns_found.py
cause a build failure when building perf with PYLINT=1?
In tools/perf/tests/Build, PY_TESTS collects all *.py files under tests/shell
to run pylint:
tools/perf/tests/Build:
ifdef PYLINT
PY_TESTS := $(shell find tests/shell -type f -name '*.py')
PYLINT_TEST_LOGS := $(PY_TESTS:tests/shell/%=shell/%.pylint_log)
Because main() in tools/perf/tests/shell/common/check_no_patterns_found.py
ends without a final newline (and without pylint directives or docstrings),
pylint reports C0304 (missing-final-newline) and fails the build when
PYLINT=1 is enabled.
Can a trailing newline be added at the end of the file?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261018125641.23064-1-breno3011alves@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 12:56 [RFC PATCH 0/5] perf/tests: convert Perl test helpers to Python Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] perf/kselftest: convert prefix.pl " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-18 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] perf/tests: convert check_all_patterns_found.pl " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-18 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] perf/tests: convert check_no_patterns_found.pl " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-18 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] perf/tests: convert check_all_lines_matched.pl " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-18 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] perf/tests: convert check_errors_whitelisted.pl " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-18 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] perf: convert Perl test helpers " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] perf/kselftest: convert prefix.pl " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-18 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] perf/tests: convert check_*.pl helpers " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-18 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] perf: convert Perl test " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/2] perf/kselftest: convert prefix.pl " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-18 13:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] perf/tests: convert check_*.pl helpers " Breno Rodrigues Alves
2026-10-18 13:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-176144@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=breno3011alves@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox