From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 10/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange loop in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info()
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:38:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1862515.VLH7GnMWUR@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4746278.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Eliminate local variable status (that is redundant) from
acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() and make that function call
acpi_get_parent() in one place.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index 274abe3da7a4..57a0a8aaa42f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -1095,7 +1095,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
struct acpi_lpi_states_array info[2], *prev, *curr;
acpi_handle handle = pr->handle;
unsigned int state_count = 0;
- acpi_status status;
unsigned int i;
int ret;
@@ -1151,11 +1150,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
prev = curr;
curr = &info[1];
- status = acpi_get_parent(handle, &handle);
- while (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ for (;;) {
struct acpi_lpi_states_array *tmp;
struct acpi_device *d;
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_parent(handle, &handle)))
+ break;
+
d = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(handle);
if (!d)
break;
@@ -1171,8 +1172,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
state_count = flatten_lpi_states(pr, state_count, curr, prev);
tmp = prev, prev = curr, curr = tmp;
-
- status = acpi_get_parent(handle, &handle);
}
/* reset the index after flattening */
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 12:29 [PATCH v1 00/17] ACPI: processor: idle/intel_idle: Add ACPI _LPI support to intel_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 01/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Expand _LPI package sanity checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 02/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Ignore _LPI states with SYSTEMIO entry method Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Unify debug in acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:34 ` [PATCH v1 05/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Split acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce lpi_state_debug() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:36 ` [PATCH v1 07/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 08/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework first-level _LPI states processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 09/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Drop redundant _LPI presence checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 11/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework flatten_lpi_states() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 12/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce too_many_states() for _LPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:40 ` [PATCH v1 13/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v1 14/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Relocate acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v1 15/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Add switch for strict _LPI processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:43 ` [PATCH v1 16/17] intel_idle: Prepare for adding ACPI _LPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:44 ` [PATCH v1 17/17] intel_idle: Add " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1862515.VLH7GnMWUR@rafael.j.wysocki \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox