Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 12/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce too_many_states() for _LPI
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:39:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1964818.CQOukoFCf9@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4746278.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

To reduce code duplication, introduce a function called too_many_states()
that will check if the total number of _LPI states for a given CPU is
too large and print a message in that case.

Use that function in flatten_lpi_states() and acpi_processor_get_lpi_info().

No functional impact beyond reducing dynamic debug flexibility.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index edc9b5d88b79..c7f206c094fb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -1044,6 +1044,16 @@ static void stash_composite_state(struct acpi_lpi_states_array *curr_level,
 	curr_level->composite_states[curr_level->composite_states_size++] = t;
 }
 
+static bool too_many_states(acpi_handle handle, unsigned int state_count)
+{
+	if (state_count < ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER)
+		return false;
+
+	acpi_handle_info(handle, "No space for more _LPI states than %d\n",
+			 ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER);
+	return true;
+}
+
 static unsigned int flatten_lpi_states(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 				       unsigned int state_count,
 				       struct acpi_lpi_states_array *curr,
@@ -1064,12 +1074,8 @@ static unsigned int flatten_lpi_states(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 		if (!(parent_lpi->flags & ACPI_LPI_STATE_FLAGS_ENABLED))
 			continue;
 
-		if (state_count >= ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER) {
-			acpi_handle_info(pr->handle,
-					 "No space for more _LPI states than %d\n",
-					 ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER);
+		if (too_many_states(pr->handle, state_count))
 			break;
-		}
 
 		flpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[state_count];
 
@@ -1135,12 +1141,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 		    lpi->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_INTEGER)
 			continue;
 
-		if (state_count >= ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER) {
-			acpi_handle_info(handle,
-					 "No space for more _LPI states than %d\n",
-					 ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER);
+		if (too_many_states(pr->handle, state_count))
 			break;
-		}
 
 		flpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[state_count++];
 		memcpy(flpi, lpi, sizeof(*lpi));
-- 
2.51.0





  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 12:29 [PATCH v1 00/17] ACPI: processor: idle/intel_idle: Add ACPI _LPI support to intel_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 01/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Expand _LPI package sanity checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 02/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Ignore _LPI states with SYSTEMIO entry method Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Unify debug in acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:34 ` [PATCH v1 05/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Split acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce lpi_state_debug() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:36 ` [PATCH v1 07/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 08/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework first-level _LPI states processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 09/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Drop redundant _LPI presence checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:38 ` [PATCH v1 10/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange loop in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 11/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework flatten_lpi_states() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-07-09 12:40 ` [PATCH v1 13/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v1 14/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Relocate acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v1 15/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Add switch for strict _LPI processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:43 ` [PATCH v1 16/17] intel_idle: Prepare for adding ACPI _LPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:44 ` [PATCH v1 17/17] intel_idle: Add " Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1964818.CQOukoFCf9@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox