Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 08/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework first-level _LPI states processing
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:37:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3703077.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4746278.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The first-level _LPI states need not be combined with the previous
level and the entry method for them cannot be ACPI_CSTATE_INTEGER, so
process them directly in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() instead of doing
a special case for them in flatten_lpi_states().

Also bail out if there are no _LPI states at the first level because
that means that there are no _LPI states at all.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index e990a43514e6..efd3e76377fa 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -1068,13 +1068,6 @@ static unsigned int flatten_lpi_states(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 
 		flpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[flat_state_cnt];
 
-		if (!prev_level) { /* leaf/processor node */
-			memcpy(flpi, t, sizeof(*t));
-			stash_composite_state(curr_level, flpi);
-			flat_state_cnt++;
-			continue;
-		}
-
 		for (i = 0; i < prev_level->composite_states_size; i++) {
 			p = prev_level->composite_states[i];
 			if (t->index <= p->enable_parent_state &&
@@ -1101,9 +1094,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 {
 	struct acpi_lpi_states_array info[2], *prev, *curr;
 	acpi_handle handle = pr->handle;
-	unsigned int state_count;
+	unsigned int state_count = 0;
 	acpi_status status;
-	int ret, i;
+	unsigned int i;
+	int ret;
 
 	/* make sure our architecture has support */
 	ret = acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(pr->id);
@@ -1117,12 +1111,45 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	curr = &info[0];
+	curr->composite_states_size = 0;
 
 	ret = acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(handle, curr);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	state_count = flatten_lpi_states(pr, 0, curr, NULL);
+	/* Copy all of the usable first-level states to power.lpi_states[]. */
+	for (i = 0; i < curr->size; i++) {
+		struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi = &curr->entries[i];
+		struct acpi_lpi_state *flpi;
+
+		/*
+		 * Skip states that are not enabled or have an inadequate entry
+		 * method for this level.
+		 */
+		if (!(lpi->flags & ACPI_LPI_STATE_FLAGS_ENABLED) ||
+		    lpi->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_INTEGER)
+			continue;
+
+		if (state_count >= ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER) {
+			acpi_handle_info(handle,
+					 "No space for more _LPI states than %d\n",
+					 ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		flpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[state_count++];
+		memcpy(flpi, lpi, sizeof(*lpi));
+		stash_composite_state(curr, flpi);
+	}
+
+	kfree(curr->entries);
+
+	/*
+	 * If there are no _LPI states at the first level, there are no _LPI
+	 * states at all.
+	 */
+	if (!state_count)
+		return -ENODATA;
 
 	prev = curr;
 	curr = &info[1];
-- 
2.51.0





  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 12:29 [PATCH v1 00/17] ACPI: processor: idle/intel_idle: Add ACPI _LPI support to intel_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 01/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Expand _LPI package sanity checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 02/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Ignore _LPI states with SYSTEMIO entry method Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Unify debug in acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:34 ` [PATCH v1 05/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Split acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce lpi_state_debug() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:36 ` [PATCH v1 07/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 09/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Drop redundant _LPI presence checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:38 ` [PATCH v1 10/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange loop in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 11/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework flatten_lpi_states() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 12/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce too_many_states() for _LPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:40 ` [PATCH v1 13/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v1 14/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Relocate acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v1 15/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Add switch for strict _LPI processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:43 ` [PATCH v1 16/17] intel_idle: Prepare for adding ACPI _LPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:44 ` [PATCH v1 17/17] intel_idle: Add " Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3703077.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox