From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 08/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework first-level _LPI states processing
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:37:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3703077.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4746278.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The first-level _LPI states need not be combined with the previous
level and the entry method for them cannot be ACPI_CSTATE_INTEGER, so
process them directly in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() instead of doing
a special case for them in flatten_lpi_states().
Also bail out if there are no _LPI states at the first level because
that means that there are no _LPI states at all.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index e990a43514e6..efd3e76377fa 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -1068,13 +1068,6 @@ static unsigned int flatten_lpi_states(struct acpi_processor *pr,
flpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[flat_state_cnt];
- if (!prev_level) { /* leaf/processor node */
- memcpy(flpi, t, sizeof(*t));
- stash_composite_state(curr_level, flpi);
- flat_state_cnt++;
- continue;
- }
-
for (i = 0; i < prev_level->composite_states_size; i++) {
p = prev_level->composite_states[i];
if (t->index <= p->enable_parent_state &&
@@ -1101,9 +1094,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
struct acpi_lpi_states_array info[2], *prev, *curr;
acpi_handle handle = pr->handle;
- unsigned int state_count;
+ unsigned int state_count = 0;
acpi_status status;
- int ret, i;
+ unsigned int i;
+ int ret;
/* make sure our architecture has support */
ret = acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(pr->id);
@@ -1117,12 +1111,45 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
return -EINVAL;
curr = &info[0];
+ curr->composite_states_size = 0;
ret = acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(handle, curr);
if (ret)
return ret;
- state_count = flatten_lpi_states(pr, 0, curr, NULL);
+ /* Copy all of the usable first-level states to power.lpi_states[]. */
+ for (i = 0; i < curr->size; i++) {
+ struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi = &curr->entries[i];
+ struct acpi_lpi_state *flpi;
+
+ /*
+ * Skip states that are not enabled or have an inadequate entry
+ * method for this level.
+ */
+ if (!(lpi->flags & ACPI_LPI_STATE_FLAGS_ENABLED) ||
+ lpi->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_INTEGER)
+ continue;
+
+ if (state_count >= ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER) {
+ acpi_handle_info(handle,
+ "No space for more _LPI states than %d\n",
+ ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_POWER);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ flpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[state_count++];
+ memcpy(flpi, lpi, sizeof(*lpi));
+ stash_composite_state(curr, flpi);
+ }
+
+ kfree(curr->entries);
+
+ /*
+ * If there are no _LPI states at the first level, there are no _LPI
+ * states at all.
+ */
+ if (!state_count)
+ return -ENODATA;
prev = curr;
curr = &info[1];
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 12:29 [PATCH v1 00/17] ACPI: processor: idle/intel_idle: Add ACPI _LPI support to intel_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 01/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Expand _LPI package sanity checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 02/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Ignore _LPI states with SYSTEMIO entry method Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Unify debug in acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:34 ` [PATCH v1 05/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Split acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce lpi_state_debug() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:36 ` [PATCH v1 07/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 09/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Drop redundant _LPI presence checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:38 ` [PATCH v1 10/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange loop in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 11/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework flatten_lpi_states() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 12/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce too_many_states() for _LPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:40 ` [PATCH v1 13/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v1 14/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Relocate acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v1 15/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Add switch for strict _LPI processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:43 ` [PATCH v1 16/17] intel_idle: Prepare for adding ACPI _LPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:44 ` [PATCH v1 17/17] intel_idle: Add " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3703077.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox