Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 09/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Drop redundant _LPI presence checks
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:37:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3349003.5fSG56mABF@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4746278.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki>

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The acpi_has_method() checks for _LPI in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info()
are redundant because acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() returns an error
when _LPI is not present, so drop them.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index efd3e76377fa..274abe3da7a4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -1107,9 +1107,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	if (!osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_LPI"))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	curr = &info[0];
 	curr->composite_states_size = 0;
 
@@ -1166,10 +1163,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_lpi_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 		if (strcmp(acpi_device_hid(d), ACPI_PROCESSOR_CONTAINER_HID))
 			break;
 
-		/* can be optional ? */
-		if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_LPI"))
-			break;
-
 		ret = acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(handle, curr);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
-- 
2.51.0





  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 12:29 [PATCH v1 00/17] ACPI: processor: idle/intel_idle: Add ACPI _LPI support to intel_idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:30 ` [PATCH v1 01/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Expand _LPI package sanity checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 02/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Ignore _LPI states with SYSTEMIO entry method Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:32 ` [PATCH v1 03/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Unify debug in acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:34 ` [PATCH v1 05/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Split acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 06/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce lpi_state_debug() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:36 ` [PATCH v1 07/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:37 ` [PATCH v1 08/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework first-level _LPI states processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-07-09 12:38 ` [PATCH v1 10/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rearrange loop in acpi_processor_get_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 11/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Rework flatten_lpi_states() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 12/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce too_many_states() for _LPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:40 ` [PATCH v1 13/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Introduce acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:41 ` [PATCH v1 14/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Relocate acpi_processor_extract_lpi_info() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:42 ` [PATCH v1 15/17] ACPI: processor: idle: Add switch for strict _LPI processing Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:43 ` [PATCH v1 16/17] intel_idle: Prepare for adding ACPI _LPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-07-09 12:44 ` [PATCH v1 17/17] intel_idle: Add " Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3349003.5fSG56mABF@rafael.j.wysocki \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox