public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
	<namhyung@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<irogers@google.com>, <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	<kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<kees@kernel.org>, <gustavoars@kernel.org>, <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	<oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Cc: <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
	<ananth.narayan@amd.com>, <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	<kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	<sandipan.das@amd.com>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/11] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:24:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711102436.4432-3-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711102436.4432-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>

After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf"),
on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no longer
return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the CCD
(Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the energy-pkg
event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.

Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.

However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event for
Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally only for
AMD CPUs.

On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:

Before:
$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.

The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a package
scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the CPUs in
the package.

After:
$ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
0

Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026 leaf")
---
Changes in v4:
* Invert the pkg scope check in init_rapl_pmus() (Peter)
* Add comments to explain the pkg scope check (Peter)

PS: Scope check logic is still kept the same (i.e., all Intel systems being 
considered as die scope), Rui will be modifying it to limit the die-scope 
only to Cascadelake-AP in a future patch on top of this patchset.
---
 arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index 0c5e7a7c43ac..df71f38ad98d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -103,6 +103,13 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = {				\
 	.event_str	= str,							\
 };
 
+/*
+ * RAPL PMU scope for AMD is package whereas for Intel it is die.
+ */
+#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope()				\
+	(boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||	\
+	 boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
+
 struct rapl_pmu {
 	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
 	int			n_active;
@@ -140,9 +147,25 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
 static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
 static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
 
+/*
+ * Helper functions to get the correct topology macros according to the
+ * RAPL PMU scope.
+ */
+static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
+{
+	return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
+					 topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+}
+
+static inline const struct cpumask *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
+{
+	return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
+					 topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
+}
+
 static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
+	unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for non
@@ -543,6 +566,7 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {
 
 static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 {
+	const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
 	struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
 	int target;
 
@@ -552,7 +576,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	pmu->cpu = -1;
 	/* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
-	target = cpumask_any_but(topology_die_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+	target = cpumask_any_but(rapl_pmu_cpumask, cpu);
 
 	/* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
 	if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
@@ -565,6 +589,8 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
 {
+	unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
+	const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
 	struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
 	int target;
 
@@ -579,14 +605,14 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
 		pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
 		rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);
 
-		rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_die_id(cpu)] = pmu;
+		rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] = pmu;
 	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
 	 * events already.
 	 */
-	target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
+	target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, rapl_pmu_cpumask);
 	if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -675,7 +701,10 @@ static const struct attribute_group *rapl_attr_update[] = {
 
 static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
 {
-	int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() * topology_max_dies_per_package();
+	int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages();
+
+	if (!rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
+		nr_rapl_pmu *= topology_max_dies_per_package();
 
 	rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!rapl_pmus)
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-11 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-11 10:24 [PATCH v4 00/11] Add per-core RAPL energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] x86/topology: Introduce topology_logical_core_id() Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 10:24 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar [this message]
2024-07-12  2:04   ` [PATCH v4 02/11] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs Zhang, Rui
2024-07-12  3:28     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-16  8:56   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] perf/x86/rapl: Rename rapl_pmu variables Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12  2:14   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] perf/x86/rapl: Make rapl_model struct global Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12  3:03   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] perf/x86/rapl: Move cpumask variable to rapl_pmus struct Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12  3:07   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-12  3:30     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] perf/x86/rapl: Add wrapper for online/offline functions Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12  3:20   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] perf/x86/rapl: Add an argument to the cleanup and init functions Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12  3:22   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] perf/x86/rapl: Modify the generic variable names to *_pkg* Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12  3:28   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the global variable rapl_msrs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12  3:29   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] perf/x86/rapl: Add per-core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12  6:15   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the unused function cpu_to_rapl_pmu Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] Add per-core RAPL energy counter support for AMD CPUs Ian Rogers
2024-07-15  9:35   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-15 15:22     ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-16  8:42       ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-16 22:47         ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-17  8:04           ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-17 15:36             ` Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240711102436.4432-3-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
    --to=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox