From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
<namhyung@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<irogers@google.com>, <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
<kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<kees@kernel.org>, <gustavoars@kernel.org>, <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
<oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Cc: <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
<ananth.narayan@amd.com>, <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
<kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
<sandipan.das@amd.com>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/11] perf/x86/rapl: Add wrapper for online/offline functions
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:24:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711102436.4432-7-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711102436.4432-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
This is in preparation for the addition of per-core RAPL counter support
for AMD CPUs.
The CPU online and offline functions will need to handle the setting up and
migration of the new per-core PMU as well. The wrapper functions added
below will make it easier to pass the corresponding args for both the PMUs.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index e3d0a82e12b9..1d36565d0cb9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -565,10 +565,10 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {
[PERF_RAPL_PSYS] = { 0, &rapl_events_psys_group, NULL, false, 0 },
};
-static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
+static int __rapl_cpu_offline(struct rapl_pmus *rapl_pmus, unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx,
+ const struct cpumask *event_cpumask, unsigned int cpu)
{
- const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
- struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = rapl_pmus->rapl_pmu[rapl_pmu_idx];
int target;
/* Check if exiting cpu is used for collecting rapl events */
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
rapl_pmu->cpu = -1;
/* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
- target = cpumask_any_but(rapl_pmu_cpumask, cpu);
+ target = cpumask_any_but(event_cpumask, cpu);
/* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
@@ -588,11 +588,16 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
-static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
+static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
- const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask = get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
- struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
+ return __rapl_cpu_offline(rapl_pmus, get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu),
+ get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+}
+
+static int __rapl_cpu_online(struct rapl_pmus *rapl_pmus, unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx,
+ const struct cpumask *event_cpumask, unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = rapl_pmus->rapl_pmu[rapl_pmu_idx];
int target;
if (!rapl_pmu) {
@@ -613,7 +618,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
* Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
* events already.
*/
- target = cpumask_any_and(rapl_pmus->cpumask, rapl_pmu_cpumask);
+ target = cpumask_any_and(rapl_pmus->cpumask, event_cpumask);
if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
return 0;
@@ -622,6 +627,13 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
}
+static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return __rapl_cpu_online(rapl_pmus, get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu),
+ get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
+}
+
+
static int rapl_check_hw_unit(void)
{
u64 msr_rapl_power_unit_bits;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 10:24 [PATCH v4 00/11] Add per-core RAPL energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] x86/topology: Introduce topology_logical_core_id() Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12 2:04 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-12 3:28 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-16 8:56 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] perf/x86/rapl: Rename rapl_pmu variables Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12 2:14 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] perf/x86/rapl: Make rapl_model struct global Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] perf/x86/rapl: Move cpumask variable to rapl_pmus struct Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12 3:07 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-12 3:30 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 10:24 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar [this message]
2024-07-12 3:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] perf/x86/rapl: Add wrapper for online/offline functions Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] perf/x86/rapl: Add an argument to the cleanup and init functions Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12 3:22 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] perf/x86/rapl: Modify the generic variable names to *_pkg* Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12 3:28 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the global variable rapl_msrs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12 3:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] perf/x86/rapl: Add per-core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-12 6:15 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-11 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the unused function cpu_to_rapl_pmu Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-11 22:23 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] Add per-core RAPL energy counter support for AMD CPUs Ian Rogers
2024-07-15 9:35 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-15 15:22 ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-16 8:42 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-16 22:47 ` Ian Rogers
2024-07-17 8:04 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-17 15:36 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711102436.4432-7-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--to=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox