From: Gautham R.Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>, <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>, Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 5/5] cpufreq: Only disable boost during cpu online when using frequency tables
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:25:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ced2q5i.fsf@BLR-5CG11610CF.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240624213400.67773-6-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Hello Mario,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> writes:
> The behavior introduced in commit f37a4d6b4a2c ("cpufreq: Fix per-policy
> boost behavior on SoCs using cpufreq_boost_set_sw()") sets up the boost
> policy incorrectly when boost has been enabled by the platform firmware
> initially even if a driver sets the policy up.
>
> This is because there are no discrete entries in the frequency table.
> Update that code to only run when a frequency table is present.
Thanks for this fix.
There are also drivers such as acpi-cpufreq which have a frequency
table, but the boost Pstates are not advertised. Thus none of the table
entries have CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ set.
>
> Fixes: f37a4d6b4a2c ("cpufreq: Fix per-policy boost behavior on SoCs using cpufreq_boost_set_sw()")
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> Cc: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@huawei.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 1fdabb660231..32c119614710 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1430,7 +1430,8 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> }
>
> /* Let the per-policy boost flag mirror the cpufreq_driver boost during init */
> - policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy);
> + if (policy->freq_table)
> + policy->boost_enabled = cpufreq_boost_enabled() && policy_has_boost_freq(policy);
>
> /*
> * The initialization has succeeded and the policy is
> online.
How about something like the following:
---
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 37f1cdf46d29..be5f4d3e9c1d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static int set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int val)
pr_debug("CPU %*pbl: Core Boosting %s.\n",
cpumask_pr_args(policy->cpus), str_enabled_disabled(val));
+ policy->boost_enabled = val;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index 10e80d912b8d..f604389b9cd6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *table = policy->freq_table;
+ /* The driver has explicitly advertised the boost-capabilities */
+ if (policy->boost_enabled)
+ return true;
+
if (!table)
return false;
> --
> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-24 21:33 [PATCH v14 0/5] AMD Pstate Driver Core Performance Boost Mario Limonciello
2024-06-24 21:33 ` [PATCH v14 1/5] cpufreq: acpi: move MSR_K7_HWCR_CPB_DIS_BIT into msr-index.h Mario Limonciello
2024-06-24 21:33 ` [PATCH v14 2/5] cpufreq: amd-pstate: initialize core precision boost state Mario Limonciello
2024-06-24 21:33 ` [PATCH v14 3/5] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Cap the CPPC.max_perf to nominal_perf if CPB is off Mario Limonciello
2024-06-24 21:33 ` [PATCH v14 4/5] Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: update doc for Per CPU boost control method Mario Limonciello
2024-06-25 12:03 ` Gautham R.Shenoy
2024-06-24 21:34 ` [PATCH v14 5/5] cpufreq: Only disable boost during cpu online when using frequency tables Mario Limonciello
2024-06-25 6:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-06-25 12:31 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-26 3:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-06-26 3:14 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-26 3:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-06-26 3:20 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-26 3:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-06-26 3:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-06-26 3:33 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-26 3:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-06-26 3:46 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-06-25 11:55 ` Gautham R.Shenoy [this message]
2024-06-25 12:32 ` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877ced2q5i.fsf@BLR-5CG11610CF.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=zouyipeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox