Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mateusz Korniak <mateusz-lists@ant.gliwice.pl>
To: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
Cc: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>,
	Kay Diederichs <kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de>,
	Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>,
	Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au>,
	Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 22:43:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1934212.TzpEgCIeIR@matkor-lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227ce39-31af-22f2-f4fa-de85466f05c7@turmel.org>

On Friday 09 of February 2018 15:13:26 Phil Turmel wrote:
> If you have bad block lists enabled in your array, MD will *never* try
> to fix the underlying sectors

As far I was able to find, failed write marks sector in BBL. 
Does data is saved under different location when such write fails for later 
reads?
Failed read marks sector in BBL too? 

I am surprised to notice that I have plenty of sectors in BBL in some arrays 
which SMART reports be quite healthy, and all members passing short/long SMART 
tests ...  
 
-- 
Mateusz Korniak
"(...) mam brata - poważny, domator, liczykrupa, hipokryta, pobożniś,
 	krótko mówiąc - podpora społeczeństwa."
				Nikos Kazantzakis - "Grek Zorba"


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-10 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-06 18:14 force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 18:59 ` Reindl Harald
2018-02-06 19:36   ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 20:03 ` Andreas Klauer
2018-02-06 21:51 ` Adam Goryachev
2018-02-06 22:02   ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 22:31     ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-06 22:46       ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-07  4:29   ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-07  9:42 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-09 19:29   ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 19:57     ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-09 20:02     ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-09 20:13     ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-09 20:29       ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 20:44         ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-09 21:22           ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 22:07             ` Wol's lists
2018-02-09 22:36               ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 20:52         ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-11 20:52           ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-09 21:17         ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-10 21:43       ` Mateusz Korniak [this message]
2018-02-11 15:41         ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-11 16:41           ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-11 17:13         ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-11 18:02           ` Wols Lists
2018-02-12 10:43           ` Mateusz Korniak
2018-02-12 15:29             ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-12 16:49               ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-12 17:16                 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-12 17:30                   ` Marc MERLIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1934212.TzpEgCIeIR@matkor-lenovo \
    --to=mateusz-lists@ant.gliwice.pl \
    --cc=Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de \
    --cc=kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au \
    --cc=marc@merlins.org \
    --cc=philip@turmel.org \
    --cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox