From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
To: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:59:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8be73cb-7dce-0b37-c498-19bf350a6c91@thelounge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180206181416.amo6geclrvc6ylrf@merlins.org>
Am 06.02.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Marc MERLIN:
> So, I have 2 drives on a 5x6TB array that have respectively 1 and 8
> pending sectors in smart.
>
> Currently, I have a check running, but it will take a while...
>
> echo check > /sys/block/md7/md/sync_action
> md7 : active raid5 sdf1[0] sdg1[5] sdd1[3] sdh1[2] sde1[1]
> 23441561600 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
> [==>..................] check = 10.5% (615972996/5860390400) finish=4822.1min speed=18125K/sec
> bitmap: 3/44 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk
>
> My understanding is that eventually it will find the bad sectors that can't be read
> and rewrite new ones (block remapping) after reading the remaining 4 drives.
>
> But that may take up to 3 days, just due to how long the check will take and size of the drives
> (they are on a SATA port multiplier, so I don't get a lot of speed)
but 18125K/sec is a joke given that you should run a scrub every week
did you try to play around with sysctl.conf?
adjusting teh vars below and run "sysctl -p" should amke a difference
after a view seconds if the hardware is capable of more performance than
that
dev.raid.speed_limit_min = 25000
dev.raid.speed_limit_max = 1000000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-06 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-06 18:14 force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 18:59 ` Reindl Harald [this message]
2018-02-06 19:36 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 20:03 ` Andreas Klauer
2018-02-06 21:51 ` Adam Goryachev
2018-02-06 22:02 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 22:31 ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-06 22:46 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-07 4:29 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-07 9:42 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-09 19:29 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 19:57 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-09 20:02 ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-09 20:13 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-09 20:29 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 20:44 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-09 21:22 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 22:07 ` Wol's lists
2018-02-09 22:36 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 20:52 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-11 20:52 ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-09 21:17 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-10 21:43 ` Mateusz Korniak
2018-02-11 15:41 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-11 16:41 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-11 17:13 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-11 18:02 ` Wols Lists
2018-02-12 10:43 ` Mateusz Korniak
2018-02-12 15:29 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-12 16:49 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-12 17:16 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-12 17:30 ` Marc MERLIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8be73cb-7dce-0b37-c498-19bf350a6c91@thelounge.net \
--to=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc@merlins.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox