From: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
To: Mateusz Korniak <mateusz-lists@ant.gliwice.pl>
Cc: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>,
Kay Diederichs <kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de>,
Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>,
Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au>,
Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 07:41:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180211154158.qiddefzyhm7y2p42@merlins.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1934212.TzpEgCIeIR@matkor-lenovo>
As a last update on those drives, sadly they seem to have real problems
with SMART, which is why I was confused when using them.
myth:~# badblocks -fsvn -b512 /dev/sdf
/dev/sdf is apparently in use by the system; badblocks forced anyway.
Checking for bad blocks in non-destructive read-write mode
From block 0 to 3131110575
Checking for bad blocks (non-destructive read-write test)
Testing with random pattern: done
Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found. (0/0/0 errors)
That means a full read/write scan ran ok.
Yet:
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 7
7 sectors still marked as pending. This makes no sense...
As far as I can tell, SMART is just broken on those drives, and they're
going back to where I got them from.
Thanks all for the replies and helping me confirm this.
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 7F55D5F27AAF9D08
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-11 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-06 18:14 force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 18:59 ` Reindl Harald
2018-02-06 19:36 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 20:03 ` Andreas Klauer
2018-02-06 21:51 ` Adam Goryachev
2018-02-06 22:02 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-06 22:31 ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-06 22:46 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-07 4:29 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-07 9:42 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-09 19:29 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 19:57 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-09 20:02 ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-09 20:13 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-09 20:29 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 20:44 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-09 21:22 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 22:07 ` Wol's lists
2018-02-09 22:36 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-09 20:52 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-11 20:52 ` Roger Heflin
2018-02-09 21:17 ` Kay Diederichs
2018-02-10 21:43 ` Mateusz Korniak
2018-02-11 15:41 ` Marc MERLIN [this message]
2018-02-11 16:41 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-11 17:13 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-11 18:02 ` Wols Lists
2018-02-12 10:43 ` Mateusz Korniak
2018-02-12 15:29 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-12 16:49 ` Marc MERLIN
2018-02-12 17:16 ` Phil Turmel
2018-02-12 17:30 ` Marc MERLIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180211154158.qiddefzyhm7y2p42@merlins.org \
--to=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de \
--cc=kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au \
--cc=mateusz-lists@ant.gliwice.pl \
--cc=philip@turmel.org \
--cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox