From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH mlx5-next 17/18] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Consider host PF for inline mode and vlan pop
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 22:36:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190628223516.9368-18-saeedm@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628223516.9368-1-saeedm@mellanox.com>
From: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com>
When ECPF is the eswitch manager, host PF is treated like other VFs.
Driver should do the same for inline mode and vlan pop.
Add new iterators to include host PF if ECPF is the eswitch manager.
Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | 1 +
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 13 +++++-----
include/linux/mlx5/vport.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
index b256f397f112..935b9429bb2a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
@@ -1891,6 +1891,7 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
esw->dev = dev;
esw->manager_vport = mlx5_eswitch_manager_vport(dev);
+ esw->first_host_vport = mlx5_eswitch_first_host_vport_num(dev);
esw->work_queue = create_singlethread_workqueue("mlx5_esw_wq");
if (!esw->work_queue) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
index bfc32bcbf544..f59183440d7f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ struct mlx5_eswitch {
int mode;
int nvports;
u16 manager_vport;
+ u16 first_host_vport;
struct mlx5_esw_functions esw_funcs;
};
@@ -422,6 +423,12 @@ static inline u16 mlx5_eswitch_manager_vport(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
MLX5_VPORT_ECPF : MLX5_VPORT_PF;
}
+static inline u16 mlx5_eswitch_first_host_vport_num(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
+{
+ return mlx5_core_is_ecpf_esw_manager(dev) ?
+ MLX5_VPORT_PF : MLX5_VPORT_FIRST_VF;
+}
+
static inline bool mlx5_eswitch_is_funcs_handler(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
{
/* Ideally device should have the functions changed supported
@@ -518,6 +525,25 @@ void mlx5e_tc_clean_fdb_peer_flows(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw);
#define mlx5_esw_for_each_vf_vport_num_reverse(esw, vport, nvfs) \
for ((vport) = (nvfs); (vport) >= MLX5_VPORT_FIRST_VF; (vport)--)
+/* Includes host PF (vport 0) if it's not esw manager. */
+#define mlx5_esw_for_each_host_func_rep(esw, i, rep, nvfs) \
+ for ((i) = (esw)->first_host_vport; \
+ (rep) = &(esw)->offloads.vport_reps[i], \
+ (i) <= (nvfs); (i)++)
+
+#define mlx5_esw_for_each_host_func_rep_reverse(esw, i, rep, nvfs) \
+ for ((i) = (nvfs); \
+ (rep) = &(esw)->offloads.vport_reps[i], \
+ (i) >= (esw)->first_host_vport; (i)--)
+
+#define mlx5_esw_for_each_host_func_vport(esw, vport, nvfs) \
+ for ((vport) = (esw)->first_host_vport; \
+ (vport) <= (nvfs); (vport)++)
+
+#define mlx5_esw_for_each_host_func_vport_reverse(esw, vport, nvfs) \
+ for ((vport) = (nvfs); \
+ (vport) >= (esw)->first_host_vport; (vport)--)
+
struct mlx5_vport *__must_check
mlx5_eswitch_get_vport(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u16 vport_num);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index aecfb636fbc6..50e5841c1698 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -344,10 +344,10 @@ mlx5_eswitch_del_fwd_rule(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
static int esw_set_global_vlan_pop(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u8 val)
{
struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
- int vf_vport, err = 0;
+ int i, err = 0;
esw_debug(esw->dev, "%s applying global %s policy\n", __func__, val ? "pop" : "none");
- mlx5_esw_for_each_vf_rep(esw, vf_vport, rep, esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs) {
+ mlx5_esw_for_each_host_func_rep(esw, i, rep, esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs) {
if (atomic_read(&rep->rep_data[REP_ETH].state) != REP_LOADED)
continue;
@@ -2330,7 +2330,7 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u8 mode,
if (err)
goto out;
- mlx5_esw_for_each_vf_vport_num(esw, vport, esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs) {
+ mlx5_esw_for_each_host_func_vport(esw, vport, esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs) {
err = mlx5_modify_nic_vport_min_inline(dev, vport, mlx5_mode);
if (err) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
@@ -2344,7 +2344,7 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u8 mode,
revert_inline_mode:
num_vport = --vport;
- mlx5_esw_for_each_vf_vport_num_reverse(esw, vport, num_vport)
+ mlx5_esw_for_each_host_func_vport_reverse(esw, vport, num_vport)
mlx5_modify_nic_vport_min_inline(dev,
vport,
esw->offloads.inline_mode);
@@ -2389,9 +2389,10 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u8 *mode)
}
query_vports:
- mlx5_esw_for_each_vf_vport_num(esw, vport, esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs) {
+ mlx5_query_nic_vport_min_inline(dev, esw->first_host_vport, &prev_mlx5_mode);
+ mlx5_esw_for_each_host_func_vport(esw, vport, esw->esw_funcs.num_vfs) {
mlx5_query_nic_vport_min_inline(dev, vport, &mlx5_mode);
- if (vport > 1 && prev_mlx5_mode != mlx5_mode)
+ if (prev_mlx5_mode != mlx5_mode)
return -EINVAL;
prev_mlx5_mode = mlx5_mode;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/mlx5/vport.h b/include/linux/mlx5/vport.h
index c147acc7bf70..6cbf29229749 100644
--- a/include/linux/mlx5/vport.h
+++ b/include/linux/mlx5/vport.h
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ enum {
MLX5_CAP_INLINE_MODE_NOT_REQUIRED,
};
+/* Vport number for each function must keep unchanged */
enum {
MLX5_VPORT_PF = 0x0,
MLX5_VPORT_FIRST_VF = 0x1,
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-28 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-28 22:35 [PATCH mlx5-next 00/18] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch and low level updates Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:35 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 01/18] net/mlx5: Add hardware definitions for sub functions Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:35 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 02/18] net/mlx5: Added MCQI and MCQS registers' description to ifc Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:35 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 03/18] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Use vport index when init rep Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:35 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 04/18] {IB, net}/mlx5: E-Switch, Use index of rep for vport to IB port mapping Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:35 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 05/18] RDMA/mlx5: Cleanup rep when doing unload Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:35 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 06/18] net/mlx5: Rename mlx5_pci_dev_type to mlx5_coredev_type Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 07/18] net/mlx5: Move pci status reg access mutex to mlx5_pci_init Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 08/18] net/mlx5: Limit scope of mlx5_get_next_phys_dev() to PCI PF devices Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 09/18] net/mlx5: Don't handle VF func change if host PF is disabled Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 10/18] net/mlx5: Reduce dependency on enabled_vfs counter and num_vfs Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 11/18] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Use correct flags when configuring vlan Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 12/18] net/mlx5: Handle host PF vport mac/guid for ECPF Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 13/18] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Refactor eswitch SR-IOV interface Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 14/18] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Consolidate eswitch function number of VFs Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 15/18] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Reg/unreg function changed event at correct stage Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 16/18] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Use iterator for vlan and min-inline setups Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-28 22:36 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2019-06-28 22:36 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 18/18] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Handle UC address change in switchdev mode Saeed Mahameed
2019-07-01 23:46 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 00/18] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch and low level updates Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190628223516.9368-18-saeedm@mellanox.com \
--to=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=bodong@mellanox.com \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox