From: "Margolin, Michael" <mrgolin@amazon.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
<sleybo@amazon.com>, <matua@amazon.com>, <gal.pressman@linux.dev>,
"Daniel Kranzdorf" <dkkranzd@amazon.com>,
Yonatan Nachum <ynachum@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/efa: Add CQ with external memory support
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 19:17:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb06d3d2-a8c2-459a-af32-bcbbdaa297b6@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250526160816.GA61950@nvidia.com>
On 5/26/2025 7:08 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 06:45:59PM +0300, Margolin, Michael wrote:
>
>> Are you suggesting turning mlx5dv_devx_umem_reg into a common verb including
>> the kernel part or some kind of rdma-core level abstraction for passing
>> dmabuf+offset+length / address+length to a create CQ/QP function?
> I think Leon was, but I'm not sure that is so worthwhile.
>
> I was thinking more of having the ioctls for things like QP/CQ/MR
> accept a more standard common set of attributes to describe the buffer
> memory and then making it simpler for the driver to get a umem from
> those common attributes.
>
> But EFA is alread sort of different because it normally uses a kernel
> allocated buffer, right?
>
> Jason
Yes, EFA is an example for a driver that doesn't need this on the
"standard" flow.
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-26 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 14:50 [PATCH for-next] RDMA/efa: Add CQ with external memory support Michael Margolin
2025-05-18 6:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-05-18 8:56 ` Margolin, Michael
2025-05-20 9:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-05-21 15:19 ` Margolin, Michael
2025-05-25 17:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-26 15:45 ` Margolin, Michael
2025-05-26 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-26 16:17 ` Margolin, Michael [this message]
2025-06-09 15:03 ` Margolin, Michael
2025-06-11 19:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-24 16:39 ` Margolin, Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb06d3d2-a8c2-459a-af32-bcbbdaa297b6@amazon.com \
--to=mrgolin@amazon.com \
--cc=dkkranzd@amazon.com \
--cc=gal.pressman@linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matua@amazon.com \
--cc=sleybo@amazon.com \
--cc=ynachum@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox