Linux-RISC-V Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for Microchip's pwm fpga core
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:17:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220613111759.1550578-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> (raw)

Hey Uwe,
Got a v2 for you...
I added some comments explaining the calculations and a documentation link
so hopefully things are a bit easier to follow.

Code wise, I went through and sorted out a bunch of issues that cycling
through the different periods/duties threw up. Along the way I found
some other problems - especially with the longer periods which I have
fixed. I also added a write to the sync register in the apply function,
which will resolve to a NOP for channels without "shadow registers".

Other than that, I managed to ditch the mchp_core_pwm_registers struct
entirely but had to add a short delay before reading back the registers
in order to compute the duty.

Thanks,
Conor.

Changes from v1:
- account for edge "quirk" while inverted
- block changing enabled channels' period
- document the hardware/driver limitations
- rearrange get_state() more logically
- fix cast sizes in get_state()
- fix remove() and probe error paths
- delete mchp_core_pwm_registers
- simplify .apply() logic
- don't warn in calculate_base()
- fix period calculation
- fix duty cycle calculation
- add COREPWM prefix to defines
- add a documentation link

Conor Dooley (2):
  pwm: add microchip soft ip corePWM driver
  MAINTAINERS: add pwm to PolarFire SoC entry

 MAINTAINERS                      |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig              |  10 +
 drivers/pwm/Makefile             |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c | 310 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 322 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c


base-commit: 61114e734ccb804bc12561ab4020745e02c468c2
-- 
2.36.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-13 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-13 11:17 Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-06-13 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: add microchip soft ip corePWM driver Conor Dooley
2022-06-14 10:25   ` kernel test robot
2022-06-14 10:34     ` Conor.Dooley
2022-06-14 12:13       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-06-14 12:16         ` Conor.Dooley
2022-06-14 12:34   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-06-14 12:38     ` Conor.Dooley
2022-06-15 19:14   ` kernel test robot
2022-06-15 19:20     ` Conor.Dooley
2022-06-13 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add pwm to PolarFire SoC entry Conor Dooley
2022-06-13 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for Microchip's pwm fpga core Conor.Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220613111759.1550578-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=daire.mcnamara@microchip.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox