Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] s390x: Define the PSW bits

[Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>]

On 2019-11-13 17:05, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 11/13/19 1:23 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> Instead of assigning obfuscated masks to the PSW dedicated to the
>> exceptions, let's define the masks explicitely, it will clarify the
> s/explicitely/explicitly/
> Try to break that up into sentences.
OK thx
>
>> usage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/s390x/asm/arch_bits.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h  |  6 ++----
>>   s390x/cstart64.S          | 13 +++++++------
>>   3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 lib/s390x/asm/arch_bits.h
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_bits.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_bits.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..0521125
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_bits.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2019 IBM Corp
>> + *
>> + * Authors:
>> + *  Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> + *
>> + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> + * under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License version 2.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef _ASM_S390X_ARCH_BITS_H_
>> +#define _ASM_S390X_ARCH_BITS_H_
>> +
>> +#define PSW_MASK_PER		0x4000000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_DAT		0x0400000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_IO		0x0200000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_EXT		0x0100000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_BASE		0x0000000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_KEY		0x00F0000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_MCHECK		0x0004000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_WAIT		0x0002000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE		0x0001000000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_ASC		0x0000C00000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_CC		0x0000300000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_PM		0x00000F0000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_RI		0x0000008000000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_EA		0x0000000100000000
>> +#define PSW_MASK_BA		0x0000000080000000
> a-f should be lower case in hex values.
> Also, do we need all of them?
> I'd like to keep it as small as poss
>
>
>>> +
>>> +#endif
>>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> index 96cca2e..34c1188 100644
>>> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> @@ -10,15 +10,13 @@
>>>   #ifndef _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>>>   #define _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>>>   
>>> +#include <asm/arch_bits.h>
>>> +
>>>   struct psw {
>>>   	uint64_t	mask;
>>>   	uint64_t	addr;
>>>   };
>>>   
>>> -#define PSW_MASK_EXT			0x0100000000000000UL
>>> -#define PSW_MASK_DAT			0x0400000000000000UL
>>> -#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE			0x0001000000000000UL
>>> -
>>>   #define CR0_EXTM_SCLP			0X0000000000000200UL
>>>   #define CR0_EXTM_EXTC			0X0000000000002000UL
>>>   #define CR0_EXTM_EMGC			0X0000000000004000UL
>>> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
>>> index eaff481..7475f32 100644
>>> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
>>> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>>    * under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License version 2.
>>>    */
>>>   #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>>> +#include <asm/arch_bits.h>
>>>   #include <asm/sigp.h>
>>>   
>>>   .section .init
>>> @@ -196,17 +197,17 @@ svc_int:
>>>   
>>>   	.align	8
>>>   initial_psw:
>>> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, clear_bss_start
>>> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, clear_bss_start
>>>   pgm_int_psw:
>>> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, pgm_int
>>> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, pgm_int
>>>   ext_int_psw:
>>> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, ext_int
>>> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, ext_int
>>>   mcck_int_psw:
>>> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, mcck_int
>>> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, mcck_int
>>>   io_int_psw:
>>> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, io_int
>>> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, io_int
>>>   svc_int_psw:
>>> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, svc_int
>>> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, svc_int
>>>   initial_cr0:
>>>   	/* enable AFP-register control, so FP regs (+BFP instr) can be used */
>>>   	.quad	0x0000000000040000
>>>
> ible.

OK


>
>> +
>> +#define PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK (PSW_MASK_EA|PSW_MASK_BA)
> That's not a bit anymore, shouldn't that be in arch_def.h?
> Also please add a comment, that this is 64 bit addressing.


Don't we use the 64bit architecture only?

Regards,

Pierre


-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen