From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] s390x: saving regs for interrupts
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 17:12:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f40bf69-6e34-7613-1ab5-83e09464c0b0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573647799-30584-2-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5262 bytes --]
On 11/13/19 1:23 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> If we use multiple source of interrupts, for exemple, using SCLP console
> to print information while using I/O interrupts or during exceptions, we
> need to have a re-entrant register saving interruption handling.
>
> Instead of saving at a static place, let's save the base registers on
> the stack.
>
> Note that we keep the static register saving that we need for the RESET
> tests.
>
> We also care to give the handlers a pointer to the save registers in
> case the handler needs it (fixup_pgm_int needs the old psw address).
So you're still ignoring the FPRs...
I disassembled a test and looked at all stds and it looks like printf
and related functions use them. Wouldn't we overwrite test FPRs if
printing in a handler?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h | 15 ++++++++++-----
> lib/s390x/interrupt.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> s390x/cstart64.S | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h b/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h
> index 4cfade9..a39a3a3 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/interrupt.h
> @@ -15,11 +15,16 @@
> #define EXT_IRQ_EXTERNAL_CALL 0x1202
> #define EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG 0x2401
>
> -void handle_pgm_int(void);
> -void handle_ext_int(void);
> -void handle_mcck_int(void);
> -void handle_io_int(void);
> -void handle_svc_int(void);
> +typedef struct saved_registers {
> + unsigned long regs[15];
> +} sregs_t;
> +
> +void handle_pgm_int(sregs_t *regs);
> +void handle_ext_int(sregs_t *regs);
> +void handle_mcck_int(sregs_t *regs);
> +void handle_io_int(sregs_t *regs);
> +void handle_svc_int(sregs_t *regs);
> +
> void expect_pgm_int(void);
> void expect_ext_int(void);
> uint16_t clear_pgm_int(void);
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> index 5cade23..7aecfc5 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/interrupt.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void check_pgm_int_code(uint16_t code)
> code == lc->pgm_int_code, code, lc->pgm_int_code);
> }
>
> -static void fixup_pgm_int(void)
> +static void fixup_pgm_int(sregs_t *regs)
> {
> switch (lc->pgm_int_code) {
> case PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION:
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void fixup_pgm_int(void)
> /* Handling for iep.c test case. */
> if (lc->trans_exc_id & 0x80UL && lc->trans_exc_id & 0x04UL &&
> !(lc->trans_exc_id & 0x08UL))
> - lc->pgm_old_psw.addr = lc->sw_int_grs[14];
> + lc->pgm_old_psw.addr = regs->regs[14];
> break;
> case PGM_INT_CODE_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
> case PGM_INT_CODE_PAGE_TRANSLATION:
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void fixup_pgm_int(void)
> /* suppressed/terminated/completed point already at the next address */
> }
>
> -void handle_pgm_int(void)
> +void handle_pgm_int(sregs_t *regs)
> {
> if (!pgm_int_expected)
> report_abort("Unexpected program interrupt: %d at %#lx, ilen %d\n",
> @@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ void handle_pgm_int(void)
> lc->pgm_int_id);
>
> pgm_int_expected = false;
> - fixup_pgm_int();
> + fixup_pgm_int(regs);
> }
>
> -void handle_ext_int(void)
> +void handle_ext_int(sregs_t *regs)
> {
> if (!ext_int_expected &&
> lc->ext_int_code != EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG) {
> @@ -134,19 +134,19 @@ void handle_ext_int(void)
> lc->ext_old_psw.mask &= ~PSW_MASK_EXT;
> }
>
> -void handle_mcck_int(void)
> +void handle_mcck_int(sregs_t *regs)
> {
> report_abort("Unexpected machine check interrupt: at %#lx",
> lc->mcck_old_psw.addr);
> }
>
> -void handle_io_int(void)
> +void handle_io_int(sregs_t *regs)
> {
> report_abort("Unexpected io interrupt: at %#lx",
> lc->io_old_psw.addr);
> }
>
> -void handle_svc_int(void)
> +void handle_svc_int(sregs_t *regs)
> {
> report_abort("Unexpected supervisor call interrupt: at %#lx",
> lc->svc_old_psw.addr);
> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
> index 8e2b21e..eaff481 100644
> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
> @@ -90,6 +90,17 @@ memsetxc:
> xc 0(1,%r1),0(%r1)
>
> .macro SAVE_REGS
> + slgfi %r15, 15 * 8
> + stmg %r0, %r14, 0(%r15)
> + lgr %r2, %r15
> + .endm
> +
> + .macro RESTORE_REGS
> + lmg %r0, %r14, 0(%r15)
> + algfi %r15, 15 * 8
> + .endm
> +
> + .macro SAVE_REGS_RESET
> /* save grs 0-15 */
> stmg %r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
> /* save cr0 */
> @@ -105,7 +116,7 @@ memsetxc:
> stfpc GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC
> .endm
>
> - .macro RESTORE_REGS
> + .macro RESTORE_REGS_RESET
> /* restore fprs 0-15 + fpc */
> la %r1, GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS
> .irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
> @@ -125,7 +136,7 @@ memsetxc:
> */
> .globl diag308_load_reset
> diag308_load_reset:
> - SAVE_REGS
> + SAVE_REGS_RESET
> /* Save the first PSW word to the IPL PSW */
> epsw %r0, %r1
> st %r0, 0
> @@ -142,7 +153,7 @@ diag308_load_reset:
> /* We lost cr0 due to the reset */
> 0: larl %r1, initial_cr0
> lctlg %c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
> - RESTORE_REGS
> + RESTORE_REGS_RESET
> lhi %r2, 1
> br %r14
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 12:23 [PATCH v1 0/4] s390x: Testing the Subchannel I/O Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:23 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] s390x: saving regs for interrupts Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 16:12 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-11-14 10:11 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 11:57 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 12:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 15:21 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 15:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 16:15 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] s390x: Define the PSW bits Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 16:05 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 8:40 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 8:53 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 15:25 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:23 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] s390x:irq: make IRQ handler weak Pierre Morel
2019-11-15 7:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-18 9:04 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:23 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] s390x: Testing the Subchannel I/O read Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 13:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-14 10:11 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-21 16:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-22 9:03 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-22 10:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-22 12:48 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 9:15 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 16:38 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 16:51 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-14 17:50 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 17:09 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 17:55 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] s390x: Testing the Subchannel I/O Thomas Huth
2019-11-13 12:43 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f40bf69-6e34-7613-1ab5-83e09464c0b0@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox