From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] s390x: saving regs for interrupts
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:11:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7d6c21e-3746-b31a-aff9-d19549feb24c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f40bf69-6e34-7613-1ab5-83e09464c0b0@linux.ibm.com>
On 2019-11-13 17:12, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 11/13/19 1:23 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> If we use multiple source of interrupts, for exemple, using SCLP console
>> to print information while using I/O interrupts or during exceptions, we
>> need to have a re-entrant register saving interruption handling.
>>
>> Instead of saving at a static place, let's save the base registers on
>> the stack.
>>
>> Note that we keep the static register saving that we need for the RESET
>> tests.
>>
>> We also care to give the handlers a pointer to the save registers in
>> case the handler needs it (fixup_pgm_int needs the old psw address).
> So you're still ignoring the FPRs...
> I disassembled a test and looked at all stds and it looks like printf
> and related functions use them. Wouldn't we overwrite test FPRs if
> printing in a handler?
If printf uses the FPRs in my opinion we should modify the compilation
options for the library.
What is the reason for printf and related functions to use floating point?
I will have a deeper look at this.
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 12:23 [PATCH v1 0/4] s390x: Testing the Subchannel I/O Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:23 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] s390x: saving regs for interrupts Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 16:12 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 10:11 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2019-11-14 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 11:57 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 12:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 15:21 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 15:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 16:15 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] s390x: Define the PSW bits Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 16:05 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 8:40 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 8:53 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 15:25 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:23 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] s390x:irq: make IRQ handler weak Pierre Morel
2019-11-15 7:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-18 9:04 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:23 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] s390x: Testing the Subchannel I/O read Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 13:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-14 10:11 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-21 16:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-22 9:03 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-22 10:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-22 12:48 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 9:15 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 16:38 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 16:51 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-14 17:50 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-14 17:09 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-14 17:55 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-13 12:35 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] s390x: Testing the Subchannel I/O Thomas Huth
2019-11-13 12:43 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7d6c21e-3746-b31a-aff9-d19549feb24c@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox