From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: dengler@linux.ibm.com, ifranzki@linux.ibm.com,
fcallies@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
agordeev@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/21] s390/ap: Introduce ap message buffer pool
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:46:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250331104633.25223C45-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250327143941.45507-4-freude@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:39:23PM +0100, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> +/*
> + * There is a need for a do-not-allocate-memory path through the
> + * ap bus layer. When ap_init_apmsg() with use_mempool set to true
Please describe exactly what the need for this path is. The current
description leaves the question: "why exactly is this needed?". And
this may confuse future readers: is this still needed?
Does this depend on (atomic?) context? Or is it just to avoid I/O?
If so, why?
> + /* create ap msg buffer memory pool */
> + ap_msg_pool = mempool_create_kmalloc_pool(ap_msg_pool_min_items,
> + AP_DEFAULT_MAX_MSG_SIZE);
> + if (IS_ERR(ap_msg_pool)) {
> + ap_msg_pool = NULL;
> + goto out;
> + }
This is not correct. mempool_create_kmalloc_pool() returns NULL on error.
Furthermore rc is not initialized on error (out path); you need to
preinitialize rc to -ENOMEM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-31 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 14:39 [PATCH v3 00/21] AP bus/zcrypt/pkey/paes no-mem-alloc patches Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] s390/ap: Move response_type struct into ap_msg struct Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] s390/ap/zcrypt: Rework AP message buffer allocation Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 10:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] s390/ap: Introduce ap message buffer pool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 10:46 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] s390/ap/zcrypt: New xflag parameter Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 11:03 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-04-09 8:40 ` Holger Dengler
2025-04-09 13:46 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce cprb mempool for cca misc functions Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 11:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce cprb mempool for ep11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework zcrypt function zcrypt_device_status_mask_ext Harald Freudenberger
2025-04-09 8:56 ` Holger Dengler
2025-04-09 13:42 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce pre-allocated device status array for cca misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-04-09 10:13 ` Holger Dengler
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce pre-allocated device status array for ep11 misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] s390/zcrypt: Remove unused functions from cca misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] s390/zcrypt: Remove CCA and EP11 card and domain info caches Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Rework cca findcard() implementation and callers Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Rework ep11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework cca misc functions kmallocs to use the cprb mempool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] s390/zcrypt: Propagate xflags argument with cca_get_info() Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] s390/zcrypt: Locate ep11_domain_query_info onto the stack instead of kmalloc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework ep11 misc functions to use cprb mempool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] s390/pkey: Rework CCA pkey handler to use stack for small memory allocs Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] s390/pkey: Rework EP11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Provide and pass xflags within pkey and zcrypt layers Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] s390/pkey/crypto: Introduce xflags param for pkey in-kernel API Harald Freudenberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250331104633.25223C45-hca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fcallies@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox