From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: dengler@linux.ibm.com, ifranzki@linux.ibm.com,
fcallies@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
agordeev@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/21] s390/ap/zcrypt: New xflag parameter
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:03:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250331110321.25223E4c-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250327143941.45507-5-freude@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
> Introduce a new flag parameter for the both cprb send functions
> zcrypt_send_cprb() and zcrypt_send_ep11_cprb(). This new
> xflags parameter ("execution flags") shall be used to provide
> execution hints and flags for this crypto request.
>
> There are two flags implemented to be used with these functions:
> * ZCRYPT_XFLAG_USERSPACE - indicates to the lower layers that
> all the ptrs address userspace. So when construction the ap msg
> copy_from_user() is to be used. If this flag is NOT set, the ptrs
> address kernel memory and thus memcpy() is to be used.
> * ZCRYPT_XFLAG_NOMEMALLOC - indicates that this task must not
> allocate memory which may be allocated with io operations.
> For the zcrypt layer this limits the number of EP11 targets
> to 16 APQNs. But as this flag is passed down the stack, it
> may induce further restrictions.
And this magic 16 APQNs is not a problem, because...?
> -static long _zcrypt_send_ep11_cprb(bool userspace, struct ap_perms *perms,
> +static long _zcrypt_send_ep11_cprb(u32 xflags, struct ap_perms *perms,
> struct zcrypt_track *tr,
> struct ep11_urb *xcrb)
> {
> + bool userspace = xflags & ZCRYPT_XFLAG_USERSPACE;
> struct zcrypt_card *zc, *pref_zc;
> struct zcrypt_queue *zq, *pref_zq;
> - struct ep11_target_dev *targets;
> + struct ep11_target_dev targetbuf[16], *targets = NULL;
This "16" and the possible limitations that come this this should be
documented somewhere.
> + if (targets && targets != targetbuf)
> + kfree(targets);
Please no NULL checks for kfree:
if (targets != targetbuf)
kfree(targets);
> +/*
> + * xflags - to be used with zcrypt_send_cprb() and
> + * zcrypt_send_ep11_cprb() for the xflags parameter.
> + */
> +#define ZCRYPT_XFLAG_USERSPACE 0x0001 /* data ptrs address userspace */
> +#define ZCRYPT_XFLAG_NOMEMALLOC 0x0002 /* do not allocate fresh memory */
What is the definition of "fresh" memory?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-31 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 14:39 [PATCH v3 00/21] AP bus/zcrypt/pkey/paes no-mem-alloc patches Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] s390/ap: Move response_type struct into ap_msg struct Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] s390/ap/zcrypt: Rework AP message buffer allocation Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 10:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] s390/ap: Introduce ap message buffer pool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 10:46 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] s390/ap/zcrypt: New xflag parameter Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 11:03 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2025-04-09 8:40 ` Holger Dengler
2025-04-09 13:46 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce cprb mempool for cca misc functions Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 11:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce cprb mempool for ep11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework zcrypt function zcrypt_device_status_mask_ext Harald Freudenberger
2025-04-09 8:56 ` Holger Dengler
2025-04-09 13:42 ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce pre-allocated device status array for cca misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-04-09 10:13 ` Holger Dengler
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce pre-allocated device status array for ep11 misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] s390/zcrypt: Remove unused functions from cca misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] s390/zcrypt: Remove CCA and EP11 card and domain info caches Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Rework cca findcard() implementation and callers Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Rework ep11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework cca misc functions kmallocs to use the cprb mempool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] s390/zcrypt: Propagate xflags argument with cca_get_info() Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] s390/zcrypt: Locate ep11_domain_query_info onto the stack instead of kmalloc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework ep11 misc functions to use cprb mempool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] s390/pkey: Rework CCA pkey handler to use stack for small memory allocs Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] s390/pkey: Rework EP11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Provide and pass xflags within pkey and zcrypt layers Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] s390/pkey/crypto: Introduce xflags param for pkey in-kernel API Harald Freudenberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250331110321.25223E4c-hca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fcallies@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox