public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
To: Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: ifranzki@linux.ibm.com, fcallies@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework zcrypt function zcrypt_device_status_mask_ext
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 15:42:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3d2080f6d0e1034ba03b5d139ea218f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a3ac12d-6aff-42d4-87fc-1d8cc5a26d06@linux.ibm.com>

On 2025-04-09 10:56, Holger Dengler wrote:
> On 27/03/2025 15:39, Harald Freudenberger wrote:
>> Rework the existing function zcrypt_device_status_mask_ext():
>> Add two new parameters to provide upper limits for
>> cards and queues. The existing implementation needed an
>> array of 256 * 256 * 4 = 256 KB which is really huge. The
>> reworked function is more flexible in the sense that the
>> caller can decide the upper limit for cards and domains to
>> be stored into the status array. So for example a caller may
>> decide to only query for cards 0...127 and queues 0...127
>> and thus only an array of size 128 * 128 * 4 = 64 KB is needed.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Looks good now. With the minor change mentioned below
> Reviewed-by: Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_api.c      | 14 +++++++++++---
>>  drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_api.h      |  3 ++-
>>  drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ccamisc.c  | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>>  drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> 
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c 
>> b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
>> index 12efcf1b54fc..504064c27a8b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/zcrypt_ep11misc.c
>> @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ int ep11_findcard2(u32 **apqns, u32 *nr_apqns, 
>> u16 cardnr, u16 domain,
>>  {
>>  	struct zcrypt_device_status_ext *device_status;
>>  	u32 *_apqns = NULL, _nr_apqns = 0;
>> -	int i, card, dom, rc = -ENOMEM;
>> +	int i, card, dom, rc;
> 
> If you initialize rc with -ENOMEM here ....
> 

You are totally right. However, I will not take this
as the following patches anyway rework this code and
the end result is that there is no alloc done within
this function and the rc variable is not needed any more.

>>  	struct ep11_domain_info edi;
>>  	struct ep11_card_info eci;
>> 
>> @@ -1609,13 +1609,16 @@ int ep11_findcard2(u32 **apqns, u32 *nr_apqns, 
>> u16 cardnr, u16 domain,
>>  				 GFP_KERNEL);
>>  	if (!device_status)
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>> -	zcrypt_device_status_mask_ext(device_status);
>> +
>> +	zcrypt_device_status_mask_ext(device_status,
>> +				      MAX_ZDEV_CARDIDS_EXT,
>> +				      MAX_ZDEV_DOMAINS_EXT);
>> 
>>  	/* allocate 1k space for up to 256 apqns */
>>  	_apqns = kmalloc_array(256, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
>>  	if (!_apqns) {
>> -		kvfree(device_status);
>> -		return -ENOMEM;
>> +		rc = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto out;
> 
> ... you do not need to set it here. Just jump to out.
> 
> if (!_apqns)
> 	goto out;
> 
>>  	}
>> 
>>  	/* walk through all the crypto apqnss */
> [...]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-27 14:39 [PATCH v3 00/21] AP bus/zcrypt/pkey/paes no-mem-alloc patches Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] s390/ap: Move response_type struct into ap_msg struct Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] s390/ap/zcrypt: Rework AP message buffer allocation Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 10:47   ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] s390/ap: Introduce ap message buffer pool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 10:46   ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] s390/ap/zcrypt: New xflag parameter Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 11:03   ` Heiko Carstens
2025-04-09  8:40   ` Holger Dengler
2025-04-09 13:46     ` Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce cprb mempool for cca misc functions Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-31 11:20   ` Heiko Carstens
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce cprb mempool for ep11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework zcrypt function zcrypt_device_status_mask_ext Harald Freudenberger
2025-04-09  8:56   ` Holger Dengler
2025-04-09 13:42     ` Harald Freudenberger [this message]
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce pre-allocated device status array for cca misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-04-09 10:13   ` Holger Dengler
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] s390/zcrypt: Introduce pre-allocated device status array for ep11 misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] s390/zcrypt: Remove unused functions from cca misc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] s390/zcrypt: Remove CCA and EP11 card and domain info caches Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Rework cca findcard() implementation and callers Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Rework ep11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework cca misc functions kmallocs to use the cprb mempool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] s390/zcrypt: Propagate xflags argument with cca_get_info() Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] s390/zcrypt: Locate ep11_domain_query_info onto the stack instead of kmalloc Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] s390/zcrypt: Rework ep11 misc functions to use cprb mempool Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] s390/pkey: Rework CCA pkey handler to use stack for small memory allocs Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] s390/pkey: Rework EP11 " Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] s390/zcrypt/pkey: Provide and pass xflags within pkey and zcrypt layers Harald Freudenberger
2025-03-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] s390/pkey/crypto: Introduce xflags param for pkey in-kernel API Harald Freudenberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3d2080f6d0e1034ba03b5d139ea218f@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=fcallies@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox