Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:14:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706091459.500FD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085229.979525-5-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] Simultaneous KVM implementations will trigger sysfs duplicate name warnings due to hardcoded kmem cache names.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing cleanup of `kvm_debugfs_dir` on module initialization error paths leads to debugfs memory leaks and Use-After-Free vulnerabilities.
--

commit f2ad6d3ed070aa40a377cc68203ba1a3e871cc2e
Author: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>

KVM: Make device name configurable

Allow KVM implementations to choose alternative device names. This is
especially useful for architectures providing multiple KVM
implementations simultaneously.

> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 271884089f58d..dcad33cc2f255 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -6464,11 +6462,22 @@ void kvm_unregister_perf_callbacks(void)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -int kvm_init(unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align, struct module *module)
> +int kvm_init(unsigned int vcpu_size, unsigned int vcpu_align, struct module *module)
> +{
> +	return kvm_init_with_dev(vcpu_size, vcpu_align, module, "kvm", KVM_MINOR);
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_init_with_dev(unsigned int vcpu_size, unsigned int vcpu_align,
> +		      struct module *module, const char *dev_name, int minor)
>  {
>  	int r;
>  	int cpu;
>  
> +	kvm_dev.minor = minor;
> +	kvm_dev.name = kstrdup(dev_name, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!kvm_dev.name)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	/* A kmem cache lets us meet the alignment requirements of fx_save. */
>  	if (!vcpu_align)
>  		vcpu_align = __alignof__(struct kvm_vcpu);
> @@ -6479,8 +6488,9 @@ int kvm_init(unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align, struct module *module)
>  					   offsetofend(struct kvm_vcpu, stats_id)
>  					   - offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch),
>  					   NULL);

[Severity: Medium]
Since the goal is to allow multiple KVM implementations simultaneously,
will the hardcoded "kvm_vcpu" string passed to kmem_cache_create_usercopy()
in kvm_init_with_dev() cause a sysfs duplicate name warning?

If a second KVM implementation is loaded, SLUB might attempt to create a
duplicate /sys/kernel/slab/kvm_vcpu sysfs directory, triggering a warning
that could crash systems with panic_on_warn enabled. Does this need to use
the configurable dev_name instead?

> +	r = -ENOMEM;
>  	if (!kvm_vcpu_cache)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_dev_name;

[ ... ]

> @@ -6547,6 +6557,8 @@ int kvm_init(unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align, struct module *module)
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>  		free_cpumask_var(per_cpu(cpu_kick_mask, cpu));
>  	kmem_cache_destroy(kvm_vcpu_cache);
> +err_dev_name:
> +	kfree(kvm_dev.name);
>  	return r;
>  }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a missing cleanup of
kvm_debugfs_dir in the error handling path of kvm_init_with_dev()?

If initialization fails during a late step like misc_register, the error
unwinding labels are executed, but debugfs_remove_recursive() is never
called for the debugfs directory created earlier by kvm_init_debug().

Since the initialization fails and the module memory is freed, could
accessing the abandoned debugfs files later cause a use-after-free when
the kernel tries to dereference invalid fops pointers?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706085229.979525-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  8:52 [PATCH v4 00/27] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] VFIO: take reference to the KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 19:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 21:12     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe) from vfio Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm) " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:14   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] KVM: Remove KVM_MMIO as config option Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 20:53   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] KVM: arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 21:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 17:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] KVM: s390: gmap: Refactor storage key and CMMA code into separate files Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] KVM: s390: Refactor prefix handling into a separate file Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] KVM: s390: Prepare kvm-s390 for a second kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:17   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 11:30     ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-06 11:58       ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:53     ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:50   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 12:15   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 20:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:07   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260706091459.500FD1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox