Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:31:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706093139.9700C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085229.979525-12-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Double `$(objtree)` prefix in `arm64-dst` causes out-of-tree builds to fail.
- [Medium] The `sysreg-defs.h` target will be unnecessarily rebuilt on every `make` invocation during out-of-tree builds due to a `targets` array mismatch.
- [Low] The include guard regex in `copy-arm64h-full.awk` fails to match standard ARM64 KVM headers that contain numbers.
- [Low] The commit message incorrectly states that included headers are rewritten to `#include <arm64/asm/...>`, but the implementation correctly rewrites them to `#include <arm64/...>` instead.
--

commit 622a9e9498e4f7fc1aed85088dd8016c40e7fc8b
Author: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>

s390: Use arm64 headers

Introduce a flexible system for sharing ARM64 headers with s390 KVM.
Selected arm64 headers or snippet of headers will be reachable by s390
code through asm/header.h.

> Transform copied includes by replacing '#include <asm/...>' with
> '#include <arm64/asm/...>' and similar for uapi headers to ensure
> correct path resolution on s390 and allow for a clear separation of s390

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but the commit message states the headers are rewritten to
'#include <arm64/asm/...>', while the awk scripts in this patch correctly
rewrite them to '#include <arm64/...>' without the 'asm/' component.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/Makefile b/arch/s390/tools/Makefile
> index f2862364fb422..bd2a00d5ce2c9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/tools/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/s390/tools/Makefile
[ ... ]
> @@ -3,8 +3,13 @@
>  # Makefile for s390 specific build tools
>  #
>  
> +include $(srctree)/arch/s390/tools/Makefile.arm64h
> +
>  kapi := arch/$(ARCH)/include/generated/asm
>  kapi-hdrs-y := $(kapi)/facility-defs.h $(kapi)/dis-defs.h
> +kapi-hdrs-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM64) += $(ARM64_TARGETS)
> +
> +targets += $(addprefix ../../../,$(kapi-hdrs-y))

[Severity: Medium]
Will this unnecessarily rebuild sysreg-defs.h on every make invocation during
out-of-tree builds?

In Makefile.arm64h, sysreg-defs.h is added to ARM64_TARGETS using an absolute
path because arm64api includes $(objtree).

Then here, it gets appended to the targets array with a relative directory
traversal using $(addprefix ../../../,$(kapi-hdrs-y)).

Prepending a relative traversal to an absolute path
(like ../../..//build_dir/...) creates a malformed path. This prevents Kbuild
from locating the .cmd file and breaks the if_changed cache.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/Makefile.arm64h b/arch/s390/tools/Makefile.arm64h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..0b32c124707d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/s390/tools/Makefile.arm64h
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
[ ... ]
> +arm64api := $(objtree)/arch/$(ARCH)/include/generated/arm64
> +arm64uapi := $(objtree)/arch/$(ARCH)/include/generated/uapi/arm64
[ ... ]
> +arm64-src = $(srctree)/arch/arm64/include/$(if $(filter uapi,$(call arm64-type,$(1))),uapi/)asm/$(call arm64-src-base,$(1))
> +arm64-dst = $(objtree)/$(if $(filter uapi,$(call arm64-type,$(1))),$(arm64uapi),$(arm64api))/$(call arm64-base,$(1))

[Severity: High]
Does this double prefix of $(objtree) break out-of-tree builds?

Since arm64api and arm64uapi are defined above with the $(objtree) prefix
already, arm64-dst prepends $(objtree)/ to them again.

This causes paths to resolve to a nested build_dir/build_dir/... structure
during out-of-tree compilation.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/copy-arm64h-full.awk b/arch/s390/tools/copy-arm64h-full.awk
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..a9b85b347f780
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/s390/tools/copy-arm64h-full.awk
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
[ ... ]
> +# Find and process the include guard in the first few lines
> +NR <= max_guard_line && !guard_found && /^#ifndef [A-Z_]+$/ {

[Severity: Low]
Does this strict regex fail to match include guards containing numbers?

For standard ARM64 KVM headers that contain numbers in their guards
(e.g., __ARM64_KVM_ARM_H__), this fails to match.

This silently omits the 'This header was copied from...' preamble in the
generated files.

> +	guard_name = $2
> +	guard_found = 1
> +	print "/* This header was copied from " srcfile " */"

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706085229.979525-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=11

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  8:52 [PATCH v4 00/27] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] VFIO: take reference to the KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 19:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 21:12     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe) from vfio Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm) " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] KVM: Remove KVM_MMIO as config option Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 20:53   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] KVM: arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 21:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 17:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:31   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] KVM: s390: gmap: Refactor storage key and CMMA code into separate files Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] KVM: s390: Refactor prefix handling into a separate file Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] KVM: s390: Prepare kvm-s390 for a second kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:17   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 11:30     ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-06 11:58       ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:53     ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:50   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06  9:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 12:15   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 20:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:07   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260706093139.9700C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox