From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com,
fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/13] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interface to view matrix mdev matrix
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 08:53:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525163cf-d656-b146-05b6-2efbbd2f5a9d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f42fa11-e9cc-20a9-3068-b103a8ead644@linux.ibm.com>
On 06/06/2018 11:10 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 06/06/2018 16:24, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> On 06/05/2018 08:40 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> On 30/05/2018 16:28, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>>> On 05/24/2018 05:10 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>>>> On 23/05/2018 16:38, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/16/2018 03:55 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/05/2018 17:11, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>>>>>>> Provides a sysfs interface to view the AP matrix configured for
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> mediated matrix device.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The relevant sysfs structures are:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /sys/devices/vfio_ap
>>>>>>>> ... [matrix]
>>>>>>>> ...... [mdev_supported_types]
>>>>>>>> ......... [vfio_ap-passthrough]
>>>>>>>> ............ [devices]
>>>>>>>> ...............[$uuid]
>>>>>>>> .................. matrix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To view the matrix configured for the mediated matrix device,
>>>>>>>> print the matrix file:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the configured matrix, not the one used by the guest.
>>>>>>> Nothing in the patches protect against binding a queue and
>>>>>>> assigning
>>>>>>> a new AP when the guest runs.
>>>>>>> The card and queue will be showed by this entry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, as stated above, this is the matrix configured for the
>>>>>> mediated matrix device. Are you suggesting here that the driver
>>>>>> should prevent assigning a new adapter or domain while a guest is
>>>>>> running? Couldn't this be a step in the process for hot (un)plugging
>>>>>> AP queues?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I mean what is the point to show this?
>>>>> It is not what the guest sees.
>>>>> Has it any use case?
>>>>
>>>> The point is to display the matrix so one can view the AP queues that
>>>> have been assigned to the mediated matrix device. This is the only way
>>>> to view the matrix. Do you not find value in being able to see what
>>>> has been assigned to the mediated matrix device?
>>>
>>> Two things:
>>> 1) I think it is better to retrieve the individual masks
>>
>> I am not certain what you mean by this. Are you suggesting we display
>> the
>> actual mask? For example, the APM:
>>
>> 08000000000000001000000000000c0000000030000000000800000000000001
>>
>> If that is the case, I completely disagree as that would be worthless
>> from
>> a user perspective. Trying to figure out which APs are configured
>> would be
>> ridiculously complicated.
>
> - It is compatible with what the AP BUS shows
> - a cut and past is easy
> - you can use a userland script to translate to another format
>
>>
>> Or, are you suggesting something like this:
>>
>> 4,67,116,117,154,155,255
>
> - this is not compatible with what the AP BUS shows
> - as in the first case this is easy to parse
>
> Both propositions look better to me.
>
>>
>> Personally, I found viewing the queues to be much more valuable when
>> configuring the mediated device's matrix. I originally displayed the
>> individual adapter and domain attributes and found it cumbersome to
>> mentally configure what the matrix looked like. If you think of the
>> lszcrypt command, it outputs the adapters and queues which is the model
>> I used for this.
>
> what is the point of seeing what the matrix looks like ?
> It is interesting for the developer not for the administrator.
> What the administrator needs is:
> - To assign AP and to see what has been assigned
> - To assign domains and to see what has been assigned
>
>>
>>> 2) As I said above, what you show is not the effective mask used by
>>> the guest
>>
>> Why would a sysfs attribute for the mediated matrix device show the
>> effective
>> mask used by the guest?
>
> OK, bad word, "effective", replace with "really".
>
> We do not implement any kind of provisioning nor do we implement update
> of the CRYCB at any point after the first mediated device open.
I think this is a way we might be able to hot plug/unplug devices.
>
>
> Binding a queue and updating the mask can be done at any time (may be
> we should change this ?)
As I said above, I think we can utilize this as a means of hot
plugging/unplugging AP
adapters and domains. If the guest is running when an adapter or domain
is assigned,
we can update the guest's CRYCB at that time.
>
>
> What is the point of showing a matrix which will never be used by the
> guest?
That is simply not true. The matrix WILL be used by a guest the next time a
guest is configured with a vfio-ap device referencing the path to the
mediated matrix device - i.e., -device vfio-ap,sysfsdev=$PATH. The point
is to show the matrix assigned to the mediated matrix device. In my
mind, the
mediated matrix device is a separate object from the guest. Sure it is used
to configure a guest's matrix when the guest is started, but it could be
used
to configure the matrix for any guest; it has no direct connection to a
particular guest until a guest using the device is started. IMHO the sysfs
attributes for the mediated matrix device reflect only the attributes of
the device, not the attributes of a guest.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-07 15:11 [PATCH v5 00/13] s390: vfio-ap: guest dedicated crypto adapters Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] KVM: s390: Interface to test whether APXA installed Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 10:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-16 10:45 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-17 9:11 ` Harald Freudenberger
2018-05-17 9:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 8:51 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-16 11:14 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 12:17 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-16 12:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] KVM: s390: CPU model support for AP virtualization Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP device driver Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 8:21 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-16 11:29 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 11:45 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-07 8:57 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-13 7:41 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-13 7:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-06-13 10:54 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-13 11:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-06-13 12:01 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-13 12:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-06-13 12:16 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-14 13:04 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] s390: vfio-ap: register matrix device with VFIO mdev framework Tony Krowiak
2018-05-11 17:18 ` Halil Pasic
2018-05-14 19:42 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-15 14:17 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-15 15:16 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-15 15:48 ` Halil Pasic
2018-05-15 16:11 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-17 7:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-21 15:13 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-22 8:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-22 21:41 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 10:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-05-16 12:48 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 12:58 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] KVM: s390: interfaces to manage guest's AP matrix Tony Krowiak
2018-05-11 16:08 ` Halil Pasic
2018-05-16 14:29 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 14:41 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-21 15:23 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-15 14:55 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-15 16:07 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 7:48 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-16 13:12 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 13:15 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-16 13:48 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-18 8:55 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-23 14:29 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-24 7:46 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure adapters Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure domains Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure control domains Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interface to view matrix mdev matrix Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 7:55 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-23 14:38 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-24 9:10 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-30 14:28 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-05 12:40 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-06 14:24 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-06 15:10 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-07 12:53 ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
2018-06-07 13:16 ` Halil Pasic
2018-06-07 14:33 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] KVM: s390: implement mediated device open callback Tony Krowiak
2018-05-16 8:03 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-23 14:45 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-24 9:08 ` Pierre Morel
2018-05-30 14:33 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-05 12:19 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-06 14:28 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-06 16:08 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-06 17:40 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-07 13:54 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-07 15:20 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-07 16:30 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-07 17:15 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-08 21:59 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-11 9:23 ` Pierre Morel
2018-06-11 11:32 ` Halil Pasic
2018-06-11 11:49 ` Janosch Frank
2018-06-11 16:26 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-11 16:50 ` Halil Pasic
2018-06-11 16:54 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-11 12:50 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-11 12:56 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-06-07 13:52 ` Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] s390: vfio-ap: implement VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO ioctl Tony Krowiak
2018-05-07 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] s390: doc: detailed specifications for AP virtualization Tony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525163cf-d656-b146-05b6-2efbbd2f5a9d@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=buendgen@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox