From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390/uaccess: remove set_fs() interface
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:51:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72753cc5-e9a9-05c5-c465-6dff9fcf679d@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125083808.GB31753@lst.de>
On 25.11.20 09:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> So, I can think of several ways to fix this (or better: make this
>> robust). However given that I will be away the next two weeks this is
>> not going to happen for the upcoming merge window. I really don't want
>> to rush this, since this has potential for severe subtle bugs... like
>> we had them already several times with our address space and dynamic
>> page table upgrade handling in the past (and like I nearly introduced
>> at least one bug with this patch).
>>
>> Therefore the first three patches of this series are scheduled for the
>> upcoming merge window, while the final set_fs() removal should come
>> one merge later.
>
> Did you manage to get back to the s390 set_fs removal?
>
Heiko has queued the following:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=87d5986345219a7e4f204726d9085ea87f3e22d0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 15:43 [PATCH 0/4] s390: set_fs() removal Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] s390/zcrypt: remove set_fs() invocation in zcrypt device driver Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] s390/dis: get rid of set_fs() usage Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-15 16:55 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] s390/uaccess: implement HAVE_GET_KERNEL_NOFAULT support Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] s390/uaccess: remove set_fs() interface Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-15 16:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-09-15 19:37 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-09-16 12:36 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-11-25 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-25 8:51 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2020-11-25 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72753cc5-e9a9-05c5-c465-6dff9fcf679d@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox