public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests 5/5] lib: s390x: Remove kvm s390 prefix from sie control block
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 10:00:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8cbd326-a393-4906-90d6-40ce9bf7f309@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DHUEWSSY4DCK.13BQA6YYBXJK5@linux.ibm.com>

On 4/16/26 09:48, Nico Boehr wrote:
> On Wed Apr 15, 2026 at 10:45 AM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> We're not kvm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Hm, is this just a cosmetic change?

Yes

> 
> On one hand this will make it harder to copy things from Linux to kut.
> 
> On the other hand, there's already a ton of divergence between Linux and kut.
> So it already isn't just copy&paste, this will make it just a bit harder.
> 

For sae we already dropped the s390 part in the control block name in 
KVM. I aimed to have sie_control_block and sae_control_block once sae 
support is added.

But I'm not too hung up on this patch.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-16  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15  8:45 [kvm-unit-tests 0/5] s390x: Cleanup virtualization library Janosch Frank
2026-04-15  8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 1/5] lib: s390x: Add function to get page root Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 11:53   ` Nico Boehr
2026-04-15 12:01     ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-15  8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 2/5] lib: s390x: sie: Allocate physical guest memory via memalign Janosch Frank
2026-04-15  8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 3/5] lib: s390x: sie: Free guest memory on destroy Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 14:21   ` Nico Boehr
2026-04-16  8:03     ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-16 10:24       ` Nico Boehr
2026-04-15  8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 4/5] lib: s390x: snippet: Add function to create a guest of specific length Janosch Frank
2026-04-16  7:50   ` Nico Boehr
2026-04-15  8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 5/5] lib: s390x: Remove kvm s390 prefix from sie control block Janosch Frank
2026-04-16  7:48   ` Nico Boehr
2026-04-16  8:00     ` Janosch Frank [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c8cbd326-a393-4906-90d6-40ce9bf7f309@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox