From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <hare@suse.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
<bvanassche@acm.org>, <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>,
<damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] scsi: libsas: remove useless dev_list delete in sas_ex_discover_end_dev()
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 19:11:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136cceb-01d9-e01f-0047-eed40ef9f91c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e077620-e0e8-71f0-0a77-66fd91320a78@oracle.com>
On 2022/12/8 18:40, John Garry wrote:
> On 08/12/2022 07:21, Jason Yan wrote:
>>>> t_list_del:
>>>> sas_rphy_free(child->rphy);
>>>> list_del(&child->disco_list_node);
>>>> - spin_lock_irq(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
>>>> - list_del(&child->dev_list_node);
>>>> - spin_unlock_irq(&parent->port->dev_list_lock);
>>>
>>> Since we have the spin lock'ing, this seems to be have been
>>> intentionally added (and not some simple typo or similar) - any idea
>>> of the origin?
>>
>> The new device used to be added to the dev_list in this function. But
>> after 92625f9bff38 ("[SCSI] libsas: restore scan order") and
>> 87c8331fcf72 ("[SCSI] libsas: prevent domain rediscovery competing
>> with ata error handling") it is added to the disco_list instead. But
>> the list_del() and locking is forgot to be removed.
>
> OK, so can we have a fixes tag then? That even helps review, as I can
> then quickly see where we went wrong.
>
Sure.
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-04 8:16 [PATCH 0/6] scsi: libsas: Some coding style fixes and cleanups Jason Yan
2022-12-04 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] scsi: libsas: move sas_get_ata_command_set() up to save the declaration Jason Yan
2022-12-05 8:45 ` John Garry
2022-12-08 6:36 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-04 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] scsi: libsas: delete wrapper function sas_discover_end_dev() Jason Yan
2022-12-05 8:57 ` John Garry
2022-12-08 6:56 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-04 8:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] scsi: libsas: rename sas_discover_sata() and related refactors Jason Yan
2022-12-04 8:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] scsi: libsas: remove useless dev_list delete in sas_ex_discover_end_dev() Jason Yan
2022-12-05 9:14 ` John Garry
2022-12-08 7:21 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-08 10:40 ` John Garry
2022-12-08 11:11 ` Jason Yan [this message]
2022-12-04 8:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] scsi: libsas: factor out sas_ata_add_dev() Jason Yan
2022-12-05 9:24 ` John Garry
2022-12-08 7:26 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-04 8:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] scsi: libsas: factor out sas_ex_add_dev() Jason Yan
2022-12-05 9:31 ` John Garry
2022-12-08 8:07 ` Jason Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1136cceb-01d9-e01f-0047-eed40ef9f91c@huawei.com \
--to=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox