public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>, Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 42/64] libfc: do not log off rports before or after discovery
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:02:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825210211.1553.3597.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825205826.1553.94414.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

From: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>

When receiving an RSCN, do not log off all rports.  This is
extremely disruptive.  If, after the GPN_FT response, some
rports haven't been listed, delete them.

Add field disc_id to structs fc_rport_priv and fc_disc.
disc_id is an arbitrary serial number used to identify the
rports found by the latest discovery.  This eliminates the need
to go through the rport list when restarting discovery.

Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---

 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_disc.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/scsi/libfc.h         |    3 +++
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_disc.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_disc.c
index f6762a5..ddf4944 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_disc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_disc.c
@@ -221,17 +221,19 @@ static void fc_disc_recv_req(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
  */
 static void fc_disc_restart(struct fc_disc *disc)
 {
-	struct fc_rport_priv *rdata, *next;
-	struct fc_lport *lport = disc->lport;
-
 	FC_DISC_DBG(disc, "Restarting discovery\n");
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(rdata, next, &disc->rports, peers)
-		lport->tt.rport_logoff(rdata);
-
 	disc->requested = 1;
-	if (!disc->pending)
-		fc_disc_gpn_ft_req(disc);
+	if (disc->pending)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Advance disc_id.  This is an arbitrary non-zero number that will
+	 * match the value in the fc_rport_priv after discovery for all
+	 * freshly-discovered remote ports.  Avoid wrapping to zero.
+	 */
+	disc->disc_id = (disc->disc_id + 2) | 1;
+	fc_disc_gpn_ft_req(disc);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -278,6 +280,7 @@ static void fc_disc_start(void (*disc_callback)(struct fc_lport *,
 		}
 		kref_put(&rdata->kref, rdata->local_port->tt.rport_destroy);
 	} else {
+		disc->disc_id = (disc->disc_id + 2) | 1;
 		fc_disc_gpn_ft_req(disc);	/* get ports by FC-4 type */
 	}
 
@@ -345,13 +348,30 @@ static int fc_disc_new_target(struct fc_disc *disc,
 static void fc_disc_done(struct fc_disc *disc, enum fc_disc_event event)
 {
 	struct fc_lport *lport = disc->lport;
+	struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
 
 	FC_DISC_DBG(disc, "Discovery complete\n");
 
-	if (disc->requested)
-		fc_disc_gpn_ft_req(disc);
-	else
-		disc->pending = 0;
+	disc->pending = 0;
+	if (disc->requested) {
+		fc_disc_restart(disc);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Go through all remote ports.  If they were found in the latest
+	 * discovery, reverify or log them in.  Otherwise, log them out.
+	 * Skip ports which were never discovered.  These are the dNS port
+	 * and ports which were created by PLOGI.
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry(rdata, &disc->rports, peers) {
+		if (!rdata->disc_id)
+			continue;
+		if (rdata->disc_id == disc->disc_id)
+			lport->tt.rport_login(rdata);
+		else
+			lport->tt.rport_logoff(rdata);
+	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&disc->disc_mutex);
 	disc->disc_callback(lport, event);
@@ -496,7 +516,7 @@ static int fc_disc_gpn_ft_parse(struct fc_disc *disc, void *buf, size_t len)
 		    ids.port_name != lport->wwpn) {
 			rdata = lport->tt.rport_create(lport, &ids);
 			if (rdata)
-				lport->tt.rport_login(rdata);
+				rdata->disc_id = disc->disc_id;
 			else
 				printk(KERN_WARNING "libfc: Failed to allocate "
 				       "memory for the newly discovered port "
@@ -640,6 +660,7 @@ static void fc_disc_single(struct fc_disc *disc, struct fc_disc_port *dp)
 
 	rdata = lport->tt.rport_create(lport, &dp->ids);
 	if (rdata) {
+		rdata->disc_id = disc->disc_id;
 		kfree(dp);
 		lport->tt.rport_login(rdata);
 	}
diff --git a/include/scsi/libfc.h b/include/scsi/libfc.h
index 093b043..517dce5 100644
--- a/include/scsi/libfc.h
+++ b/include/scsi/libfc.h
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ struct fc_rport_libfc_priv {
  * @ids: remote port identifiers and roles
  * @flags: REC and RETRY supported flags
  * @max_seq: maximum number of concurrent sequences
+ * @disc_id: discovery identifier
  * @maxframe_size: maximum frame size
  * @retries: retry count in current state
  * @e_d_tov: error detect timeout value (in msec)
@@ -218,6 +219,7 @@ struct fc_rport_priv {
 	struct fc_rport_identifiers ids;
 	u16			   flags;
 	u16		           max_seq;
+	u16			   disc_id;
 	u16			   maxframe_size;
 	unsigned int	           retries;
 	unsigned int	           e_d_tov;
@@ -678,6 +680,7 @@ struct fc_disc {
 	unsigned char		requested;
 	unsigned short		seq_count;
 	unsigned char		buf_len;
+	u16			disc_id;
 
 	void (*disc_callback)(struct fc_lport *,
 			      enum fc_disc_event);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-25 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-25 20:58 [PATCH 00/64] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for scsi-misc Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 01/64] fcoe: Add format spacing to FCOE_NETDEV_DBG debug macro Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 02/64] libfc: Fix misleading debug statement Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 03/64] fcoe: libfcoe: extra semicolon in CHECK_LOGGING macros causes compile error Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 04/64] fcoe, libfc: adds per cpu exch pool within exchange manager(EM) Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 05/64] fcoe, libfc: fully makes use of per cpu exch pool and then removes em_lock Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 06/64] libfc: Export FC headers Robert Love
2009-08-27 10:27   ` Christof Schmitt
2009-08-27 17:42     ` Robert Love
2009-08-28  8:32       ` Swen Schillig
2009-08-28 16:58         ` Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 07/64] fcoe: Add sysfs parameter to fcoe for minimum DDP read I/O size Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 08/64] libfcoe: fcoe_ctlr_destroy use cancel_work_sync instead of flush_work Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 09/64] fcoe: fix missing error check in call to fcoe_if_init Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 10/64] fcoe: remove unnecessary list and lock initializations Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 11/64] fcoe: interface changes to fcoe_if_create and fcoe_if_destroy Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 12/64] fcoe: Introduce and allocate fcoe_interface structure, 1:1 with net_device Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 13/64] fcoe: move netdev to fcoe_interface Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 14/64] fcoe: move packet handlers from fcoe_port " Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 15/64] fcoe: move FIP controller " Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 16/64] fcoe: move offload exchange manager pointer " Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 17/64] fcoe: remove fcoe_interface->priv pointer Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 18/64] fcoe: fcoe_interface create, destroy and refcounting Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 19/64] fcoe: split out per interface setup Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 20/64] fcoe: add mutex to protect create and destroy Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 21/64] fcoe: move the host-list add/remove to keep out VN_Ports Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 22/64] fcoe: Fix module ref count bug by adding NETDEV UNREGISTER handling Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 23/64] fcoe: use rtnl mutex in place of hostlist lock Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 24/64] libfc: prepare to split off struct fc_rport_priv from fc_rport_libfc_priv Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 25/64] libfc: change interface for rport_create Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 26/64] libfc: fix RPORT_TO_PRIV and PRIV_TO_RPORT() macros Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 27/64] libfc: make fc_rport_priv the primary rport interface Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 28/64] libfc: change elsct to use FC_ID instead of rdata Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 29/64] libfc: make rport structure optional Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 30/64] libfc: rearrange code in fc_rport_work Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 31/64] libfc: rename rport event CREATED to READY Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 32/64] libfc: don't create dummy (rogue) remote ports Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 33/64] libfc: fix rport event race between READY and LOGO Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 34/64] libfc: eliminate disc->event Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 35/64] libfc: remove unused disc->delay element Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 36/64] libfc: rport debug messages were printing pointer values Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 37/64] libfc: simplify fc_lport_rport_callback Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 38/64] libfc: make rport module maintain the rport list Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 39/64] libfc: have rport_create do a lookup for pre-existing rports first Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 40/64] libfc: change to make remote port callback optional Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 41/64] libfc: move rport_lookup into fc_rport.c Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 43/64] libfc: discovery restart sequence error fix Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 44/64] libfc: rearrange code in fc_disc_gpn_ft_resp() Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 45/64] libfc: handle discovery failure more correctly Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 46/64] libfc: fix: empty zone causes endless discovery retries Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 47/64] libfc: discovery retry should clear pending first Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 48/64] libfc: discovery gpn_ft parse bug Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 49/64] libfc: clean up point-to-point discovery code Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 50/64] libfc: don't do discovery before callback is set Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 51/64] libfc: Initialize fc_rport_identifiers inside fc_rport_create Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 52/64] libfc: Always reset remote port roles when receiving PRLI Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 53/64] libfc: move remote port lookup for ELS requests into fc_rport.c Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 54/64] libfc: fix: rport_recv_req needs disc_mutex when calling rport_lookup Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 55/64] libfc: improve debug messages for ELS response handlers Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 56/64] libfc: correctly handle incoming PLOGI request Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 57/64] libfc: fix rport error handling for login-required and invalid ops Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 58/64] libfc: re-login to remote ports that send us LOGO Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 59/64] libfc: LOGO response code had extraeous enter_rtv Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 60/64] libfc: use ADISC to verify rport login state Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 61/64] libfc: fix handling of incoming Discover Address (ADISC) requests Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 62/64] libfc: send GPN_ID in reaction to single-port RSCNs Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:04 ` [PATCH 63/64] libfc: don't swap OX_ID and RX_ID when sending BA_RJT Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:04 ` [PATCH 64/64] fcoe: flush per-cpu thread work when destroying interface Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090825210211.1553.3597.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=jeykholt@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox