From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>, Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 55/64] libfc: improve debug messages for ELS response handlers
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:03:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825210321.1553.98526.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825205826.1553.94414.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Improve lport and rport debug messages to indicate whether
the response is LS_ACC, LS_RJT, closed, or timeout.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_elsct.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c | 8 ++++----
include/scsi/libfc.h | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_elsct.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_elsct.c
index 5e8b011..d655924 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_elsct.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_elsct.c
@@ -70,3 +70,41 @@ int fc_elsct_init(struct fc_lport *lport)
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(fc_elsct_init);
+
+/**
+ * fc_els_resp_type() - return string describing ELS response for debug.
+ * @fp: frame pointer with possible error code.
+ */
+const char *fc_els_resp_type(struct fc_frame *fp)
+{
+ const char *msg;
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ switch (-PTR_ERR(fp)) {
+ case FC_NO_ERR:
+ msg = "response no error";
+ break;
+ case FC_EX_TIMEOUT:
+ msg = "response timeout";
+ break;
+ case FC_EX_CLOSED:
+ msg = "response closed";
+ break;
+ default:
+ msg = "response unknown error";
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ switch (fc_frame_payload_op(fp)) {
+ case ELS_LS_ACC:
+ msg = "accept";
+ break;
+ case ELS_LS_RJT:
+ msg = "reject";
+ break;
+ default:
+ msg = "response unknown ELS";
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ return msg;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
index d3f4e0c..3f2f723 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
@@ -1006,13 +1006,13 @@ static void fc_lport_rft_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
struct fc_frame_header *fh;
struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
+ FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
+
if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
return;
mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID response\n");
-
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RFT_ID) {
FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID response, but in state "
"%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
@@ -1060,13 +1060,13 @@ static void fc_lport_rpn_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
struct fc_frame_header *fh;
struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
+ FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RPN_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
+
if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
return;
mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RPN_ID response\n");
-
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RPN_ID) {
FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RPN_ID response, but in state "
"%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
@@ -1112,13 +1112,13 @@ static void fc_lport_scr_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
u8 op;
+ FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a SCR %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
+
if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
return;
mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a SCR response\n");
-
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_SCR) {
FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a SCR response, but in state "
"%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
@@ -1333,13 +1333,13 @@ static void fc_lport_logo_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
u8 op;
+ FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a LOGO %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
+
if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
return;
mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a LOGO response\n");
-
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_LOGO) {
FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a LOGO response, but in state "
"%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
@@ -1415,13 +1415,13 @@ static void fc_lport_flogi_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
unsigned int e_d_tov;
u16 mfs;
+ FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a FLOGI %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
+
if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
return;
mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a FLOGI response\n");
-
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_FLOGI) {
FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a FLOGI response, but in state "
"%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
index 02200b2..d014b28 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static void fc_rport_plogi_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
mutex_lock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
- FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a PLOGI response\n");
+ FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a PLOGI %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
if (rdata->rp_state != RPORT_ST_PLOGI) {
FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a PLOGI response, but in state "
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static void fc_rport_prli_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
mutex_lock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
- FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a PRLI response\n");
+ FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a PRLI %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
if (rdata->rp_state != RPORT_ST_PRLI) {
FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a PRLI response, but in state "
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static void fc_rport_logo_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
mutex_lock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
- FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a LOGO response\n");
+ FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a LOGO %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
if (rdata->rp_state != RPORT_ST_LOGO) {
FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a LOGO response, but in state "
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static void fc_rport_rtv_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
mutex_lock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
- FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a RTV response\n");
+ FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a RTV %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
if (rdata->rp_state != RPORT_ST_RTV) {
FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Received a RTV response, but in state "
diff --git a/include/scsi/libfc.h b/include/scsi/libfc.h
index 265f106..e18e5ce 100644
--- a/include/scsi/libfc.h
+++ b/include/scsi/libfc.h
@@ -1084,4 +1084,9 @@ void fc_destroy_exch_mgr(void);
int fc_setup_rport(void);
void fc_destroy_rport(void);
+/*
+ * Internal libfc functions.
+ */
+const char *fc_els_resp_type(struct fc_frame *);
+
#endif /* _LIBFC_H_ */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-25 20:58 [PATCH 00/64] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for scsi-misc Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 01/64] fcoe: Add format spacing to FCOE_NETDEV_DBG debug macro Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 02/64] libfc: Fix misleading debug statement Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 03/64] fcoe: libfcoe: extra semicolon in CHECK_LOGGING macros causes compile error Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 04/64] fcoe, libfc: adds per cpu exch pool within exchange manager(EM) Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 05/64] fcoe, libfc: fully makes use of per cpu exch pool and then removes em_lock Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:58 ` [PATCH 06/64] libfc: Export FC headers Robert Love
2009-08-27 10:27 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-08-27 17:42 ` Robert Love
2009-08-28 8:32 ` Swen Schillig
2009-08-28 16:58 ` Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 07/64] fcoe: Add sysfs parameter to fcoe for minimum DDP read I/O size Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 08/64] libfcoe: fcoe_ctlr_destroy use cancel_work_sync instead of flush_work Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 09/64] fcoe: fix missing error check in call to fcoe_if_init Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 10/64] fcoe: remove unnecessary list and lock initializations Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 11/64] fcoe: interface changes to fcoe_if_create and fcoe_if_destroy Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 12/64] fcoe: Introduce and allocate fcoe_interface structure, 1:1 with net_device Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 13/64] fcoe: move netdev to fcoe_interface Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 14/64] fcoe: move packet handlers from fcoe_port " Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 15/64] fcoe: move FIP controller " Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 16/64] fcoe: move offload exchange manager pointer " Robert Love
2009-08-25 20:59 ` [PATCH 17/64] fcoe: remove fcoe_interface->priv pointer Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 18/64] fcoe: fcoe_interface create, destroy and refcounting Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 19/64] fcoe: split out per interface setup Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 20/64] fcoe: add mutex to protect create and destroy Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 21/64] fcoe: move the host-list add/remove to keep out VN_Ports Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 22/64] fcoe: Fix module ref count bug by adding NETDEV UNREGISTER handling Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 23/64] fcoe: use rtnl mutex in place of hostlist lock Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 24/64] libfc: prepare to split off struct fc_rport_priv from fc_rport_libfc_priv Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 25/64] libfc: change interface for rport_create Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 26/64] libfc: fix RPORT_TO_PRIV and PRIV_TO_RPORT() macros Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 27/64] libfc: make fc_rport_priv the primary rport interface Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:00 ` [PATCH 28/64] libfc: change elsct to use FC_ID instead of rdata Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 29/64] libfc: make rport structure optional Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 30/64] libfc: rearrange code in fc_rport_work Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 31/64] libfc: rename rport event CREATED to READY Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 32/64] libfc: don't create dummy (rogue) remote ports Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 33/64] libfc: fix rport event race between READY and LOGO Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 34/64] libfc: eliminate disc->event Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 35/64] libfc: remove unused disc->delay element Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 36/64] libfc: rport debug messages were printing pointer values Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 37/64] libfc: simplify fc_lport_rport_callback Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 38/64] libfc: make rport module maintain the rport list Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:01 ` [PATCH 39/64] libfc: have rport_create do a lookup for pre-existing rports first Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 40/64] libfc: change to make remote port callback optional Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 41/64] libfc: move rport_lookup into fc_rport.c Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 42/64] libfc: do not log off rports before or after discovery Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 43/64] libfc: discovery restart sequence error fix Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 44/64] libfc: rearrange code in fc_disc_gpn_ft_resp() Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 45/64] libfc: handle discovery failure more correctly Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 46/64] libfc: fix: empty zone causes endless discovery retries Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 47/64] libfc: discovery retry should clear pending first Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 48/64] libfc: discovery gpn_ft parse bug Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 49/64] libfc: clean up point-to-point discovery code Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 50/64] libfc: don't do discovery before callback is set Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:02 ` [PATCH 51/64] libfc: Initialize fc_rport_identifiers inside fc_rport_create Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 52/64] libfc: Always reset remote port roles when receiving PRLI Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 53/64] libfc: move remote port lookup for ELS requests into fc_rport.c Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 54/64] libfc: fix: rport_recv_req needs disc_mutex when calling rport_lookup Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 56/64] libfc: correctly handle incoming PLOGI request Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 57/64] libfc: fix rport error handling for login-required and invalid ops Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 58/64] libfc: re-login to remote ports that send us LOGO Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 59/64] libfc: LOGO response code had extraeous enter_rtv Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 60/64] libfc: use ADISC to verify rport login state Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 61/64] libfc: fix handling of incoming Discover Address (ADISC) requests Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:03 ` [PATCH 62/64] libfc: send GPN_ID in reaction to single-port RSCNs Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:04 ` [PATCH 63/64] libfc: don't swap OX_ID and RX_ID when sending BA_RJT Robert Love
2009-08-25 21:04 ` [PATCH 64/64] fcoe: flush per-cpu thread work when destroying interface Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090825210321.1553.98526.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jeykholt@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox