From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for WRITE ATOMIC (16)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 09:00:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917090021.7C6E81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917084553.559765-6-cassel@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] scsi: scsi_debug: zone write pointer incremented on failed ATOMIC WRITE
--
commit 9183d5d7f092b92218c3638f33edc6839086d9f3
Author: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for WRITE ATOMIC (16)
WRITE ATOMIC (16) is a write command, so on a zoned device it is subject to
the access requirements of the zone that it addresses, and it advances the
write pointer of a sequential write required zone. This patch validates the
access and advances the write pointer holding the zone metadata write lock
across both operations.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index 5a95b7cd7a44c..d52b1f762afb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> @@ -6209,7 +6209,24 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
[ ... ]
> ret = do_device_access(sip, scp, 0, lba, len, 0, true, true);
> +
> + /* If ZBC zone then bump its write pointer */
> + if (sdebug_dev_is_zoned(devip)) {
> + zbc_inc_wp(devip, lba, len);
[Severity: Medium]
Does this code advance the write pointer even if do_device_access() fails?
If a command like WRITE ATOMIC (16) is submitted with an invalid DMA
direction (e.g., DMA_FROM_DEVICE via SG_IO) or a truncated scatter-gather
list, do_device_access() can return -1 or a short length.
Because the write pointer in resp_atomic_write() is incremented before
checking the return value of do_device_access(), the mock device's internal
zone state could become out-of-sync with the simulated physical medium.
This could cause subsequent valid writes to be incorrectly rejected with
UNALIGNED WRITE COMMAND.
> + sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
> + }
> +
> if (unlikely(ret == -1))
> return DID_ERROR << 16;
> if (unlikely(ret != len * sdebug_sector_size))
> return DID_ERROR << 16;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917084553.559765-4-cassel@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 8:45 [PATCH 0/2] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 8:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 9:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 10:42 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 8:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 9:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17 9:09 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 9:07 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 9:38 ` John Garry
2026-09-17 9:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 10:26 ` John Garry
2026-09-17 10:35 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 15:42 ` John Garry
2026-09-17 16:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 16:40 ` John Garry
2026-09-17 17:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-18 2:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-18 5:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-18 6:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-18 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-18 7:27 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917090021.7C6E81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox