From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqvEDwt5b2-LsIG6@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7472e4a-cf81-4e3d-b44a-94b06214ca5f@kernel.org>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 04:05:54PM +0700, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2026/09/17 15:45, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > ZBC-3 r06 (T10/BSR INCITS 579), 4.5.3.3.2 Write access pattern
> > requirements for sequential write required zones, states:
> >
> > The device server terminates with CHECK CONDITION status, with the
> > sense key set to ILLEGAL REQUEST, and the additional sense code set
> > to UNALIGNED WRITE COMMAND a write command, other than an entire
> > medium write same command, that specifies:
> > a) the starting LBA in a sequential write required zone set to a
> > value that is not equal to the write pointer for that sequential
> > write required zone; or
> > b) an ending LBA that is not equal to the last logical block within
> > a physical block (see SBC-5).
> >
> > That is why sd_zbc_read_zones() sets the zone_write_granularity queue
> > limit to the physical block size of a host-managed device, exposing the
> > constraint to user space.
> >
> > check_zbc_access_params() implements condition a) but not condition b):
> > it verifies that a write to a sequential write required zone starts at
> > the write pointer of the zone, but never validates the ending LBA. As a
> > consequence, when scsi_debug emulates a host-managed device whose
> > physical block size is larger than its logical block size, for instance
> > with zbc=managed sector_size=512 physblk_exp=3, a write of a single
> > logical block at the write pointer of a sequential zone is accepted and
> > advances the write pointer by one logical block. The write pointer is
> > then no longer a multiple of the zone_write_granularity reported for the
> > device, so nothing can write at it at the granularity that was
> > advertised, and the zone can only be used again after being reset.
> >
> > Implement condition b) as well, with the same sense data as the write
> > pointer check, as the standard gives both conditions the same sense key
> > and additional sense code. The exclusion of an entire medium write same
> > command needs no special case: such a command spans the whole medium, so
> > it is already terminated with WRITE BOUNDARY VIOLATION by the preceding
> > check.
> >
> > The check is placed in check_zbc_access_params(), which every command
> > that advances a zone write pointer reaches first: WRITE, WRITE SCATTERED
> > and WRITE SAME. Reads return earlier in the function and are unaffected.
> >
> > Sequential write preferred zones, which are emulated for host-aware
> > devices with zbc=aware, are left alone: writes to them are not required
> > to be sequential, and Linux does not restrict the write granularity of
> > host-aware devices.
> >
> > With the default physblk_exp=0, the physical block size equals the
> > logical block size and the new check is a no-op.
> >
> > Assisted-by: LLM
> > Fixes: f0d1cf9378bd ("scsi: scsi_debug: Add ZBC zone commands")
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
>
> Looks good, but that will be another conflict with linux-next...
> May be rebase the fix on scsi-staging and let's push it to 7.4 instead?
Considering that the fixes are only for a moduled used for debug,
I can do that.
Will rebase on mkp/7.4/scsi-staging
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 8:45 [PATCH 0/2] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 8:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 9:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 10:42 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-09-17 8:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 9:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 9:09 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 9:07 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 9:38 ` John Garry
2026-09-17 9:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 10:26 ` John Garry
2026-09-17 10:35 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 15:42 ` John Garry
2026-09-17 16:10 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 16:40 ` John Garry
2026-09-17 17:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-18 2:27 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-18 5:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-18 6:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-18 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-18 7:27 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqvEDwt5b2-LsIG6@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox