Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 16:05:54 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7472e4a-cf81-4e3d-b44a-94b06214ca5f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917084553.559765-5-cassel@kernel.org>

On 2026/09/17 15:45, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> ZBC-3 r06 (T10/BSR INCITS 579), 4.5.3.3.2 Write access pattern
> requirements for sequential write required zones, states:
> 
>   The device server terminates with CHECK CONDITION status, with the
>   sense key set to ILLEGAL REQUEST, and the additional sense code set
>   to UNALIGNED WRITE COMMAND a write command, other than an entire
>   medium write same command, that specifies:
>     a) the starting LBA in a sequential write required zone set to a
>        value that is not equal to the write pointer for that sequential
>        write required zone; or
>     b) an ending LBA that is not equal to the last logical block within
>        a physical block (see SBC-5).
> 
> That is why sd_zbc_read_zones() sets the zone_write_granularity queue
> limit to the physical block size of a host-managed device, exposing the
> constraint to user space.
> 
> check_zbc_access_params() implements condition a) but not condition b):
> it verifies that a write to a sequential write required zone starts at
> the write pointer of the zone, but never validates the ending LBA. As a
> consequence, when scsi_debug emulates a host-managed device whose
> physical block size is larger than its logical block size, for instance
> with zbc=managed sector_size=512 physblk_exp=3, a write of a single
> logical block at the write pointer of a sequential zone is accepted and
> advances the write pointer by one logical block. The write pointer is
> then no longer a multiple of the zone_write_granularity reported for the
> device, so nothing can write at it at the granularity that was
> advertised, and the zone can only be used again after being reset.
> 
> Implement condition b) as well, with the same sense data as the write
> pointer check, as the standard gives both conditions the same sense key
> and additional sense code. The exclusion of an entire medium write same
> command needs no special case: such a command spans the whole medium, so
> it is already terminated with WRITE BOUNDARY VIOLATION by the preceding
> check.
> 
> The check is placed in check_zbc_access_params(), which every command
> that advances a zone write pointer reaches first: WRITE, WRITE SCATTERED
> and WRITE SAME. Reads return earlier in the function and are unaffected.
> 
> Sequential write preferred zones, which are emulated for host-aware
> devices with zbc=aware, are left alone: writes to them are not required
> to be sequential, and Linux does not restrict the write granularity of
> host-aware devices.
> 
> With the default physblk_exp=0, the physical block size equals the
> logical block size and the new check is a no-op.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Fixes: f0d1cf9378bd ("scsi: scsi_debug: Add ZBC zone commands")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>

Looks good, but that will be another conflict with linux-next...
May be rebase the fix on scsi-staging and let's push it to 7.4 instead?

Either way,

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-17  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-17  8:45 [PATCH 0/2] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17  8:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17  9:05   ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-09-17 10:42     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17  8:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17  9:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17  9:09     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17  9:07   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17  9:38   ` John Garry
2026-09-17  9:56     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 10:26       ` John Garry
2026-09-17 10:35         ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 15:42           ` John Garry
2026-09-17 16:10             ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 16:40               ` John Garry
2026-09-17 17:37               ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-18  2:27                 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-18  5:37                   ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-18  6:15                     ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-18  7:06                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-18  7:27                         ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7472e4a-cf81-4e3d-b44a-94b06214ca5f@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkp@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox