From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
roberto.sassu@huawei.com, Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
eric.snowberg@oracle.com, jarkko@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca,
sudeep.holla@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org,
joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, noodles@meta.com,
sebastianene@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] security: ima: call ima_init() again at late_initcall_sync for defered TPM
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 06:57:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aesGU8a3mbVzvteH@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhRQWHEWQ5NzOPiu8jtYv6UsRm8WVS4fd74AbkOcAd4y_g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Paul,
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 2:13 PM Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds good. Once the patch is posted, I’ll review it as well.
> > Sorry again for the noise, and thanks for your patience ;)
>
> My apologies for not getting a chance to look at this patchset sooner.
>
> This seems like an obvious, perhaps even stupid, question, but I have
> to ask: if IMA can be properly initialized via late_initcall_sync(),
> why not simply do the initialization in late_initcall_sync() and drop
> the late_initcall() initialization?
>
> Does any IMA functionality suffer if initialization waits until
> late_initcall_sync()? If so, it seems non-critical if waiting until
> _sync() is acceptable, as it appears in these patches/comments.
This is the way first patch did, and here is some discussion for this
(Might you have seen, but in case of you missed):
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/a6a0e15286c983d720de227c6827adbe976c5b9b.camel@linux.ibm.com/
Thanks.
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 16:24 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] fix FF-A call failed with pKVM when ff-a driver is built-in Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] security: ima: call ima_init() again at late_initcall_sync for defered TPM Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 17:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-22 18:46 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 19:41 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 21:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-23 5:55 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 11:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-23 11:20 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 12:34 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 12:53 ` Jonathan McDowell
2026-04-23 13:07 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 13:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-23 13:55 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 14:03 ` Jonathan McDowell
2026-04-23 14:33 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 18:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-23 18:13 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-24 1:27 ` Paul Moore
2026-04-24 5:57 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2026-04-24 20:15 ` Paul Moore
2026-04-24 20:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-24 21:08 ` Paul Moore
2026-04-24 22:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-24 22:10 ` Paul Moore
2026-04-24 22:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-25 4:53 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 14:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-23 17:02 ` Jonathan McDowell
2026-04-23 17:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] tpm: tpm_crb_ffa: revert defered_probed when tpm_crb_ffa is built-in Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 10:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] firmware: arm_ffa: revert ffa_init() initcall level to device_initcall Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 9:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] firmware: arm_ffa: check pkvm initailised when initailise ffa driver Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 8:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-04-23 10:29 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aesGU8a3mbVzvteH@e129823.arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@earth.li \
--cc=noodles@meta.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox