SUPERH platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] watchdog: sh_mobile: add driver
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 09:54:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13683715.SQ3ktnuEDS@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422802074-1921-6-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>

Hi Wolfram,

Thank you for the patch.

On Sunday 01 February 2015 15:47:54 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> 
> Add basic support for an RCLK watchdog found in at least all RCar-Gen2
> based SoCs from Renesas. It probably works even for the "Secure
> watchdog" of some of those SoCs according to the specs I have. Setting a
> timeout value is not implemented yet, I didn't need it. A restart
> handler is in place, though.

This looks good, I just have three small comments.

> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig         |   8 ++
>  drivers/watchdog/Makefile        |   1 +
>  drivers/watchdog/sh_mobile_wdt.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/sh_mobile_wdt.c

[snip]

> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sh_mobile_wdt.c
> b/drivers/watchdog/sh_mobile_wdt.c new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..35016c147f33
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sh_mobile_wdt.c

[snip]

> +static int sh_mobile_wdt_restart_handler(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +					 unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> +{
> +	struct sh_wdt_priv *priv = container_of(nb, struct sh_wdt_priv,
> +						restart_handler);
> +
> +	sh_wdt_start(&priv->wdev);
> +	sh_wdt_write(priv, 0xfff0, RWTCNT);

Is there a reason to set the counter to 0xfff0 instead of 0xffff ?

> +
> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}
> +
> +static int sh_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct sh_wdt_priv *priv;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	u8 val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	priv->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> +
> +	priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> +
> +	clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> +	val = readb_relaxed(priv->base + RWTCSRA);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> +
> +	priv->wdev.bootstatus = (val & RWTCSRA_WOVF) ? WDIOF_CARDRESET : 0;
> +	priv->wdev.info = &sh_wdt_ident,
> +	priv->wdev.ops = &sh_wdt_ops,
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> +	watchdog_set_drvdata(&priv->wdev, priv);
> +	watchdog_set_nowayout(&priv->wdev, nowayout);
> +
> +	ret = watchdog_register_device(&priv->wdev);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot register watchdog device\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	priv->restart_handler.notifier_call = sh_mobile_wdt_restart_handler;
> +	priv->restart_handler.priority = 192;

Just for my information, how did you choose 192 for the priority ?

> +	ret = register_restart_handler(&priv->restart_handler);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register restart handler (err = 
%d)\n",
> ret); +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sh_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct sh_wdt_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	unregister_restart_handler(&priv->restart_handler);
> +	watchdog_unregister_device(&priv->wdev);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id sh_mobile_wdt_ids[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "renesas,rwdt-rcar", },
> +	{ /* sentinel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sh_mobile_wdt_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver sh_wdt_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "sh_mobile_wdt",
> +		.of_match_table = sh_mobile_wdt_ids,
> +	},
> +	.probe = sh_wdt_probe,
> +	.remove = sh_wdt_remove,
> +};

How about PM (system and runtime) support ? How does the watchdog behave 
during system suspend ? You could then replace the clk_prepare_enable() and 
clk_disable_unprepare() calls with pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put().

> +module_platform_driver(sh_wdt_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SH Mobile Watchdog Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Wolfram Sang <wsa@sang-engineering.com>");

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-02  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-01 14:47 [RFC 5/5] watchdog: sh_mobile: add driver Wolfram Sang
2015-02-02  0:28 ` Simon Horman
2015-02-02  1:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-02  1:54 ` Simon Horman
2015-02-02  9:54 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-02-02 10:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-02 10:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-02 10:09 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-02-02 11:25 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-02 13:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-03  8:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-02-03  9:09 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13683715.SQ3ktnuEDS@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox