From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: Add Lager clock workarounds for SDHI and MMCIF
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:31:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532858AC.20103@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140318125247.21670.94176.sendpatchset@w520>
On 18/03/14 15:01, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Tuesday 18 March 2014 14:48:36 Ben Dooks wrote:
>> On 18/03/14 14:25, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 18 March 2014 21:52:47 Magnus Damm wrote:
>>>> From: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
>>>>
>>>> Add MMCIF1, SDHI0 and SDHI2 to the clock workaround list for
>>>> Lager multiplatform. Without these additional lines wakeup
>>>> from Suspend-to-RAM never happens.
>>>
>>> What about fixing the root cause instead of piling up hacks ?
>>
>> See RFC to move the drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c out of drivers/sh.
>
> I wasn't sure whether the problem that this patch tries to work around was
> related to runtime PM as it wasn't mentioned in the commit message.
>
>> I need to address the issue that the code does not actually allow any
>> devices to PM.
>
> I've replied to your RFC and have studied the issue further since then.
>
> First of all, I think we should get Rafael Wysocki and Felipe Balbi in the
> loop, as Rafael is probably the reference person for runtime PM, and Felipe
> has submitted an alternative proposal to manage device clocks automatically.
I thought Felipes was pretty much what was already implemented in the
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c driver?
> Then, just copying the drivers/sh/pm-runtime.c over to drivers/base/ doesn't
> seem to be a good idea to me. Core infrastructure code in drivers/base/ needs
> to be properly documented, and thus properly understood. I feel like we're
> rushing thing, taking code that seem to work but that isn't really understood,
> and turning it into core code.
It does not need to be moved there, it would probably be better off
having drivers/sh bein build and at-least fixing the two issues with
the drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c
> I think we should take a step back here, understand exactly what we're doing,
> and write documentation.
I would suggest that we build drivers/sh/runtime_pm.c for the
multiplatform case and add initialsiation calls from the relevant
arch setup files in arch/arm/mach-shmobile.
Once this is done we can then look at fixing the issues with making
some generic code.
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-18 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-18 12:52 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: Add Lager clock workarounds for SDHI and MMCIF Magnus Damm
2014-03-18 13:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-18 13:48 ` Ben Dooks
2014-03-18 13:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-18 14:31 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2014-03-18 15:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-18 16:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-19 0:02 ` Simon Horman
2014-03-19 0:07 ` Simon Horman
2014-03-19 1:03 ` Magnus Damm
2014-03-19 10:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-03-19 12:30 ` Magnus Damm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532858AC.20103@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox