From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Timo Kokkonen <timo.kokkonen@offcode.fi>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by infrastructure
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:50:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C1C041.3080504@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150805073605.GW9999@pengutronix.de>
Hi Uwe,
On 08/05/2015 12:36 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Pádraig,
>
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:43:39AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 04/08/15 03:13, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> The watchdog infrastructure is currently purely passive, meaning
>>> it only passes information from user space to drivers and vice versa.
>>>
>>> Since watchdog hardware tends to have its own quirks, this can result
>>> in quite complex watchdog drivers. A number of scanarios are especially common.
>>>
>>> - A watchdog is always active and can not be disabled, or can not be disabled
>>> once enabled. To support such hardware, watchdog drivers have to implement
>>> their own timers and use those timers to trigger watchdog keepalives while
>>> the watchdog device is not or not yet opened.
>>> - A variant of this is the desire to enable a watchdog as soon as its driver
>>> has been instantiated, to protect the system while it is still booting up,
>>> but the watchdog daemon is not yet running.
>>
>> Just mentioning that patting the watchdog in the boot loader
>> (by patching grub etc.) can be a more general solution here as it
>> avoids hangs if the kernel crashes before it runs the watchdog driver,
>> which is especially true if PXE loaded across the net for example.
>> Also this tends to be better spaced between boot start and user space loading.
>
> the watchdog I'm currently working with on a powerpc platform has a
> unchangable timeout of ~1 s. To make the machine boot I patched the
> bootloader and need some automatic pinging in the kernel before
> userspace takes over.
>
Does using arch_initcall in the watchdog driver help here, or is that
still too slow and you really need to hack the kernel ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-05 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-04 2:13 [PATCH 0/8] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by infrastructure Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 2:13 ` [PATCH 1/8] watchdog: watchdog_dev: Use single variable name for struct watchdog_device Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 11:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-04 2:13 ` [PATCH 2/8] watchdog: Introduce hardware maximum timeout in watchdog core Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 12:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-04 15:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 15:52 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-04 16:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-05 8:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-05 9:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 2:13 ` [PATCH 3/8] watchdog: Introduce WDOG_RUNNING flag Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 12:25 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-04 15:41 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-04 15:56 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 2:13 ` [PATCH 4/8] watchdog: Make set_timeout function optional Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 15:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-04 16:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 2:13 ` [PATCH 5/8] watchdog: imx2: Convert to use infrastructure triggered keepalives Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 15:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-04 2:13 ` [PATCH 6/8] watchdog: retu: " Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 2:13 ` [PATCH 7/8] watchdog: gpio_wdt: " Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 2:13 ` [PATCH 8/8] watchdog: at91sam9: " Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 11:24 ` [PATCH 0/8] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by infrastructure Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-04 15:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-04 23:43 ` Pádraig Brady
2015-08-05 0:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-05 7:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-05 7:50 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-08-05 8:27 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-05 17:13 ` David Teigland
2015-08-05 17:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-05 17:51 ` David Teigland
2015-08-05 19:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-05 19:51 ` David Teigland
2015-08-05 20:21 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C1C041.3080504@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=P@draigBrady.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timo.kokkonen@offcode.fi \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox